1928
810 Ohio Court of Appeals opinions from 1928.
- Stoyle v. State 165 N.E. 596, (Ohio Ct. App. 1928)
- Hisylvania Coal Co. v. Haskins 6 Ohio Law. Abs. 179, (Ohio Ct. App. 1928)
- Burch v. State 6 Ohio Law. Abs. 202, (Ohio Ct. App. 1928)
- Schmidt, Admx. v. Prudential Ins. Co. 174 N.E. 605, (Ohio Ct. App. 1928)
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Union Savings Bank Co. 163 N.E. 221, (Ohio Ct. App. 1928)
- State, Ex Rel. Van Den Eynden v. Paulson 162 N.E. 653, (Ohio Ct. App. 1928)
- Brink v. Berne 162 N.E. 779, (Ohio Ct. App. 1928)
- Cszbina v. Kalnay 6 Ohio Law. Abs. 210, (Ohio Ct. App. 1928)
- Lee v. Fike 162 N.E. 682, (Ohio Ct. App. 1928)
- Felger v. Thompson 161 N.E. 42, (Ohio Ct. App. 1928)
- Huber v. Guglielmi 163 N.E. 571, (Ohio Ct. App. 1928)
- Swift & Co. v. See 6 Ohio Law. Abs. 277, (Ohio Ct. App. 1928)
- Arnold v. Ohio Gas & Electric Co. 162 N.E. 765, (Ohio Ct. App. 1928)
- American National Co. v. Thompson Spot Welder Co. 161 N.E. 435, (Ohio Ct. App. 1928)
- Ferguson v. Siegel 163 N.E. 723, (Ohio Ct. App. 1928)
- Lashure v. East Ohio Gas Co. 165 N.E. 305, (Ohio Ct. App. 1928)
- Bender v. Addams 162 N.E. 604, (Ohio Ct. App. 1928)
- St. Clair v. Teeples 6 Ohio Law. Abs. 174, (Ohio Ct. App. 1928)
- Stroizer v. Paul 6 Ohio Law. Abs. 229, (Ohio Ct. App. 1928)
- Gilbert v. Thow 6 Ohio Law. Abs. 266, (Ohio Ct. App. 1928)
- Savage v. State 6 Ohio Law. Abs. 171, (Ohio Ct. App. 1928)
- Shearer v. the Union Mtg. Co. 162 N.E. 696, (Ohio Ct. App. 1928)
- Worthington Co. v. Schan 6 Ohio Law. Abs. 242, (Ohio Ct. App. 1928)
- Ward Baking Co. v. Trizzino 161 N.E. 557, (Ohio Ct. App. 1928)
- Interstate Motor Freight Co. v. Girard 163 N.E. 206, (Ohio Ct. App. 1928)
- Ferguson v. Pierson 162 N.E. 677, (Ohio Ct. App. 1928)
- Nash Woodland Motor Co. v. Lusk 168 N.E. 67, (Ohio Ct. App. 1928)
- Hall v. Collart 163 N.E. 304, (Ohio Ct. App. 1928)
- Marmorstein v. Schuck 163 N.E. 218, (Ohio Ct. App. 1928)
- Glovka v. Fortun 163 N.E. 309, (Ohio Ct. App. 1928)
- Morris Arnoff Realty Co. v. Bryant 162 N.E. 746, (Ohio Ct. App. 1928)
- Marmorstein v. Schuck 163 N.E. 508, (Ohio Ct. App. 1928)
- Industrial Commission v. Sylva 162 N.E. 777, (Ohio Ct. App. 1928)
- Wiegand v. Wiegand 163 N.E. 36, (Ohio Ct. App. 1928)
- Selzer v. Turske 164 N.E. 65, (Ohio Ct. App. 1928)
- Aurend v. Schroeder, Admr. 165 N.E. 591, (Ohio Ct. App. 1928)
- Schmidt v. Hicks 162 N.E. 762, (Ohio Ct. App. 1928)
- Zander v. Fanslaw 162 N.E. 745, (Ohio Ct. App. 1928)
- Union Cent. Life Ins. v. Deran 6 Ohio Law. Abs. 152, (Ohio Ct. App. 1928)
- Ranson v. Brook 6 Ohio Law. Abs. 174, (Ohio Ct. App. 1928)
- Meyer v. Meyer 6 Ohio Law. Abs. 178, (Ohio Ct. App. 1928)
- Boelscher v. Boelscher 6 Ohio Law. Abs. 199, (Ohio Ct. App. 1928)
- Nash Woodland Motors Co. v. Pesker 6 Ohio Law. Abs. 213, (Ohio Ct. App. 1928)
- Harvard Lumber Co. v. Kneblewicz 6 Ohio Law. Abs. 227, (Ohio Ct. App. 1928)
- Sentich v. Village of Cleveland Hts. 6 Ohio Law. Abs. 235, (Ohio Ct. App. 1928)
- Wiegand v. Wiegand 6 Ohio Law. Abs. 331, (Ohio Ct. App. 1928)
- Ruud Mfg. Co. v. McGean 6 Ohio Law. Abs. 456, (Ohio Ct. App. 1928)
- Cuyahoga Baking Co. v. Rees 6 Ohio Law. Abs. 180, (Ohio Ct. App. 1928)
- Schraeder v. State 162 N.E. 647, (Ohio Ct. App. 1928)
- N.Y., C. St. L. Rd. Co. v. Biermacher 162 N.E. 720, (Ohio Ct. App. 1928)