1898
327 Superior Court of Pennsylvania opinions from 1898.
- Lehman v. Paxton 7 Pa. Super. 259, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Newport & Sherman Valley Railroad v. Seager 7 Pa. Super. 268, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Appeal of Tarbell 7 Pa. Super. 283, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Estate of McFadden 7 Pa. Super. 368, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Estate of Sharp 7 Pa. Super. 372, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Manning v. Shoemaker 7 Pa. Super. 375, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Riland v. Hirshler 7 Pa. Super. 384, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Estate of Kachline 7 Pa. Super. 163, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Rockwell v. Tupper 7 Pa. Super. 174, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Kutz v. Naugle 7 Pa. Super. 179, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Alexander v. Pennsylvania Railroad 7 Pa. Super. 183, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Baxter v. Hurlburt 7 Pa. Super. 187, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Hyndman Water Co. v. Borough of Hyndman 7 Pa. Super. 191, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- J. R. Clausen & Son v. Bellevue Building & Loan Ass'n 7 Pa. Super. 217, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Menner v. President of the Delaware & Hudson Canal Co. 7 Pa. Super. 135, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Clements v. Dempsey 7 Pa. Super. 52, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Opening of Second Avenue in the Borough of Conshohocken 7 Pa. Super. 55, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Opening of Second Avenue in the Borough of Conshohocken 7 Pa. Super. 62, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Gring v. Sinking Spring Water Co. 7 Pa. Super. 63, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- County of Sullivan v. Middendorf 7 Pa. Super. 71, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Commonwealth v. Adams 7 Pa. Super. 74, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Commonwealth v. Cornelly 7 Pa. Super. 77, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Atherholt v. Atherholt 7 Pa. Super. 82, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Wheeland v. Atwood 7 Pa. Super. 86, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Kirby v. Coolbaugh 7 Pa. Super. 91, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Rockwell v. Borough of Eldred 7 Pa. Super. 95, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Lee ex rel. Walker v. Sallada 7 Pa. Super. 98, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Kane v. City of Philadelphia 7 Pa. Super. 109, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Airey v. Kunkle 7 Pa. Super. 112, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Price v. County of Lancaster 7 Pa. Super. 119, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Dutton v. Pyle 7 Pa. Super. 126, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- In re Sperring 7 Pa. Super. 131, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Estate of Evans 7 Pa. Super. 142, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Estate of Evans 7 Pa. Super. 146, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Rieker v. City of Lancaster 7 Pa. Super. 149, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Lancaster Hotel Co. v. City of Lancaster 7 Pa. Super. 159, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Hayes's Estate 7 Pa. Super. 160, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Estate of Hicks 7 Pa. Super. 274, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Commonwealth ex rel. Henderson v. O'Donnell 7 Pa. Super. 49, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Commonwealth ex rel. Nuber v. Keeper of Workhouse 6 Pa. Super. 420, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- McNeile v. Cridland 6 Pa. Super. 428, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Wile's Estate 6 Pa. Super. 435, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Koons v. McNamee 6 Pa. Super. 445, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Lipper v. Bouvé, Crawford & Co. 6 Pa. Super. 452, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Hires & Co. v. Norton 6 Pa. Super. 457, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Bixler & Correll v. Lesh 6 Pa. Super. 459, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Clark v. Koplin 6 Pa. Super. 462, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Petition of McHenry 6 Pa. Super. 464, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Bogert v. Batterton 6 Pa. Super. 468, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Doyle v. Longstreth 6 Pa. Super. 475, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)