1898
327 Superior Court of Pennsylvania opinions from 1898.
- Griffin v. Davis 6 Pa. Super. 481, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Estate of Worthington 6 Pa. Super. 484, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Claster Bros. v. Katz 6 Pa. Super. 487, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Taylor v. Paul 6 Pa. Super. 496, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Heyer v. Cunningham Piano Co. 6 Pa. Super. 504, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Newbold v. Boon 6 Pa. Super. 511, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Gattle Bros. v. Kremp 6 Pa. Super. 514, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Smucker v. Pennsylvania Railroad 6 Pa. Super. 521, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- McKay v. Pearson 6 Pa. Super. 529, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Peck, Phillips & Wallace Co. ex rel. John Fullerton & Son v. Stevenson 6 Pa. Super. 536, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Grier v. Borough of Homestead 6 Pa. Super. 542, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Ross v. Hudson 6 Pa. Super. 552, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Pollock v. Ingram 6 Pa. Super. 556, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Davis v. Hamilton 6 Pa. Super. 562, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- McKeone v. Christman 6 Pa. Super. 569, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Moore v. Phillips 6 Pa. Super. 570, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Schultz v. Burlock 6 Pa. Super. 573, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Matten v. Lichtenwalner 6 Pa. Super. 575, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Myers v. Fritchman 6 Pa. Super. 580, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Acetylene Light, Heat & Power Co. v. Beck 6 Pa. Super. 584, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Yedinskey v. Strouse 6 Pa. Super. 587, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Philadelphia Bourse v. Downing 6 Pa. Super. 590, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Kleinert v. Rees 6 Pa. Super. 594, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Coble v. Zook 6 Pa. Super. 597, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Wilkes-Barre Record v. County of Luzerne 6 Pa. Super. 600, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Gilmore & Duffy v. Dunleavy 6 Pa. Super. 603, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Gill & Fisher, Ltd. v. O'Rourke 6 Pa. Super. 605, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Commonwealth v. Lewis 6 Pa. Super. 610, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- D. G. Yuengling & Son v. Jennings 6 Pa. Super. 614, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Auer v. Mauser 6 Pa. Super. 618, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Estate of Potter 6 Pa. Super. 627, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Estate of Potter 6 Pa. Super. 633, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Louchheim v. Maguire 6 Pa. Super. 635, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Kahn v. Maguire 6 Pa. Super. 639, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Jones v. Cleveland 6 Pa. Super. 640, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Gwinn v. Lee 6 Pa. Super. 646, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- McNulty ex rel. Bresnahan v. Prudential Insurance 7 Pa. Super. 1, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Division of Sugar Notch Borough 7 Pa. Super. 4, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Liebig Manufacturing Co. v. Hill 7 Pa. Super. 15, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Quinn v. Shamokin & Mount Carmel Electric Railway Co. 7 Pa. Super. 19, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- O'Donnell v. Breck 7 Pa. Super. 24, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Barnes v. Bonta Plate Glass Co. 7 Pa. Super. 29, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Reap v. City of Scranton 7 Pa. Super. 32, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Bittenbender v. Biesecker 7 Pa. Super. 41, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Clark v. Lindsay 7 Pa. Super. 43, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Leader v. Dunlap 6 Pa. Super. 243, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Estate of Heller 6 Pa. Super. 246, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Commonwealth v. Spencer 6 Pa. Super. 256, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Commonwealth ex rel. John T. Baldwin & Co. v. Yeisley 6 Pa. Super. 273, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)
- Skinner v. Chase 6 Pa. Super. 279, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1898)