1902
399 Superior Court of Pennsylvania opinions from 1902.
- Commonwealth v. Quiggle 19 Pa. Super. 343, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Tyrone Gas & Water Co. v. Burley 19 Pa. Super. 348, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Chicago Building & Manufacturing Co. v. Browning 19 Pa. Super. 355, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- McKinney v. United Traction Co. 19 Pa. Super. 362, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Custer v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad 19 Pa. Super. 365, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Healy v. Wayne Title & Trust Co. 19 Pa. Super. 371, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Philadelphia v. Wellens 19 Pa. Super. 379, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Crouse v. Miller 19 Pa. Super. 384, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Schweers v. Muhlenberg 19 Pa. Super. 388, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Moses v. Powers 19 Pa. Super. 393, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Biery v. Steckel 19 Pa. Super. 396, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Spicks v. Prospect Brewing Co. 19 Pa. Super. 399, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Rickey v. Tutelman 19 Pa. Super. 403, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Mcanniny v. Miller 19 Pa. Super. 406, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Commonwealth v. Plymouth Township 19 Pa. Super. 408, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Commonwealth v. McCullough 19 Pa. Super. 412, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Wagner v. Hoffman 19 Pa. Super. 414, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Commonwealth ex rel. v. Everts 19 Pa. Super. 419, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Reading City v. Heilman 19 Pa. Super. 422, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Menovsky v. Menovsky 19 Pa. Super. 427, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Commonwealth v. Beale 19 Pa. Super. 434, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Replogle v. Singer 19 Pa. Super. 442, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Potter v. Scranton Railway Co. 19 Pa. Super. 444, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Lewin v. Pauli 19 Pa. Super. 447, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Kislinski v. Gilboy 19 Pa. Super. 453, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Kelly v. Donnelly 19 Pa. Super. 456, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Swain v. Brady 19 Pa. Super. 459, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Kless v. Youghiogheny Mining Co. 18 Pa. Super. 551, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Washington Female Seminary v. Washington Borough 18 Pa. Super. 555, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Holleran v. Life Assurance Co. of America 18 Pa. Super. 573, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Chapman v. Faith 18 Pa. Super. 578, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Harrison's Estate 18 Pa. Super. 588, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Woolman v. Hancock Ice Co. 18 Pa. Super. 596, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Rondinella v. Metropolitan Life Insurance 18 Pa. Super. 613, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Weitzel v. Traders' National Bank 18 Pa. Super. 615, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Powers v. City of Philadelphia 18 Pa. Super. 621, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Winnemore v. Philadelphia 18 Pa. Super. 625, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Whitecar v. Supreme Castle Knights of Golden Eagle 18 Pa. Super. 631, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Neilson v. Equitable Trust Co. 18 Pa. Super. 635, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Philadelphia v. Adams 18 Pa. Super. 639, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Marshall v. Pilots' Ass'n 18 Pa. Super. 644, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Commonwealth v. Meeser 19 Pa. Super. 1, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Jacobs v. Central Railroad 19 Pa. Super. 13, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Kimball v. Commonwealth Title Insurance & Trust Co. 19 Pa. Super. 20, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Mansfield's Estate 19 Pa. Super. 26, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Commonwealth Title, etc., Co. v. Folz 19 Pa. Super. 28, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Hall v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'n 19 Pa. Super. 31, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Snader v. Murphy 19 Pa. Super. 35, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Swisher v. Sipps 19 Pa. Super. 43, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Butler Street 19 Pa. Super. 48, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)