1902
399 Superior Court of Pennsylvania opinions from 1902.
- Merritt v. Getz 19 Pa. Super. 505, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Zinnell v. Bergdoll 19 Pa. Super. 508, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Chester City Presbyterian Church v. Conlin 19 Pa. Super. 515, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Mercur v. Media Electric Light, Heat & Power Co. 19 Pa. Super. 519, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Wills v. Hardcastle 19 Pa. Super. 525, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Byrne v. Montgomery & Chester Electric Railway 19 Pa. Super. 531, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Hughes's Estate 19 Pa. Super. 534, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Knauer v. McKoon 19 Pa. Super. 539, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Patton's Estate 19 Pa. Super. 545, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Webster v. Hopewell Borough 19 Pa. Super. 549, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Fink v. Miller 19 Pa. Super. 556, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Austin Manufacturing Co. v. Duerr 19 Pa. Super. 560, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Stetson v. Rosenberger 19 Pa. Super. 567, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Dewald v. Berkheiser 19 Pa. Super. 570, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Commonwealth v. Kean 19 Pa. Super. 576, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Clark v. Price 19 Pa. Super. 582, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- English v. English 19 Pa. Super. 586, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Wesley v. Sharpe 19 Pa. Super. 600, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Raeder v. Butler 19 Pa. Super. 604, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Reynolds v. Callender 19 Pa. Super. 610, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Factoryville & Abington Turnpike & Plank Road 19 Pa. Super. 613, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Car v. Elsbree 19 Pa. Super. 618, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Commonwealth ex rel. Smith v. Butler 19 Pa. Super. 626, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Lyon v. Reichard 19 Pa. Super. 635, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Fague's Estate 19 Pa. Super. 638, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Huber Manufacturing Co. v. Smithgall 19 Pa. Super. 641, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Hennessy v. Anstock 19 Pa. Super. 644, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Canfield v. Borough 19 Pa. Super. 649, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Wright v. Lehman Township 19 Pa. Super. 653, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Boyle's Lunacy 20 Pa. Super. 1, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Kulp v. Luzerne County 20 Pa. Super. 7, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Potts v. Harmer 19 Pa. Super. 252, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- DeTurck v. Woelfel 19 Pa. Super. 265, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- DeTurck v. Woelfel 19 Pa. Super. 270, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Alters v. Journeymen Bricklayers Protective Ass'n 19 Pa. Super. 272, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- John v. Philadelphia 19 Pa. Super. 277, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Commonwealth v. Mintz 19 Pa. Super. 283, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Brown v. Schellenberg 19 Pa. Super. 286, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Stockley v. Schwerdfeger 19 Pa. Super. 289, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Graham v. Philadelphia 19 Pa. Super. 292, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Miller v. City of Bradford 19 Pa. Super. 297, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Bradley v. McHale 19 Pa. Super. 300, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Hewitt v. Pittsburg, Shawmut & Northern Railroad 19 Pa. Super. 304, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Rudy v. Myton 19 Pa. Super. 312, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Rudy v. Myton 19 Pa. Super. 319, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Fritchey Lumber Co. v. B. F. Isenberg Milling Co. 19 Pa. Super. 321, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Obold v. United Traction Co. 19 Pa. Super. 326, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Austrian v. United Traction Co. 19 Pa. Super. 329, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- French v. Burns 19 Pa. Super. 333, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)
- Mauk's Estate 19 Pa. Super. 338, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902)