1912
381 Superior Court of Pennsylvania opinions from 1912.
- Dougherty v. Davis 51 Pa. Super. 229, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Felin v. Futcher 51 Pa. Super. 233, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Hanby v. Bailey 51 Pa. Super. 244, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Horvitch v. Eaton 51 Pa. Super. 251, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Palm v. Palm 51 Pa. Super. 260, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Hershey v. Delone 51 Pa. Super. 265, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- McKeown's Petition 51 Pa. Super. 277, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Shoemaker v. Adams Express Co. 51 Pa. Super. 284, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Post v. American Central Insurance 51 Pa. Super. 352, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Commonwealth v. Shields 50 Pa. Super. 337, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Summit Hill Borough 50 Pa. Super. 117, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Bierly v. Hamor 50 Pa. Super. 124, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- William Flaccus Oak Leather Co. v. Heasley 50 Pa. Super. 127, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Klein v. Levenson 50 Pa. Super. 132, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Thompson v. Thompson 50 Pa. Super. 159, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- United States Horse Shoe Co. v. Erie, Reed Park & Lakeside Railway Co. 50 Pa. Super. 174, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Realty Co. v. Gioshio 50 Pa. Super. 185, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Jewell v. Frank 50 Pa. Super. 193, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Kinert v. Kapp 50 Pa. Super. 222, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- McPherson v. Pittsburg Railways Co. 50 Pa. Super. 233, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. Harl 50 Pa. Super. 236, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Zahloot v. Adams Express Co. 50 Pa. Super. 238, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Carlitz v. Briggs 50 Pa. Super. 67, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Noble v. Erwin 50 Pa. Super. 72, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Moore's Estate 50 Pa. Super. 76, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Ives v. Scranton Textile Co. 50 Pa. Super. 83, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Gettysburg School District v. Cumberland Township School District 50 Pa. Super. 87, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Smith v. J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co. 50 Pa. Super. 92, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Mengel v. Williamson 50 Pa. Super. 100, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Birkle v. Coleman 50 Pa. Super. 105, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Consolidated Fruit Jar Co. v. Leonard 50 Pa. Super. 113, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Shaffer v. Lauria 50 Pa. Super. 135, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Cake v. Sunbury Borough 50 Pa. Super. 145, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Commonwealth v. Feist 50 Pa. Super. 152, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Car Advertising Co. v. Rohr McHenry Distilling Co. 49 Pa. Super. 442, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Reily v. P. H. Glatfelter Co. 49 Pa. Super. 447, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Davis v. Komer 49 Pa. Super. 542, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Walsh v. Norris 49 Pa. Super. 545, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Palmer v. Chester County Gas Co. 49 Pa. Super. 572, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Darlington v. Watson 49 Pa. Super. 611, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Commonwealth v. Divoskein 49 Pa. Super. 614, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Commonwealth v. Brink 49 Pa. Super. 620, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Commonwealth v. Martin 49 Pa. Super. 626, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Commonwealth v. Keeper of County Prison 49 Pa. Super. 647, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Biddle v. Biddle 50 Pa. Super. 30, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Biddle v. Biddle 50 Pa. Super. 43, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Bannister v. Spring Garden Mutual Fire Insurance 50 Pa. Super. 45, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Pihs's Lunacy 50 Pa. Super. 51, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Lilly v. Jaggard 48 Pa. Super. 439, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Cunningham v. Cunningham 48 Pa. Super. 442, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)