1912
381 Superior Court of Pennsylvania opinions from 1912.
- Haas v. Northern Central Railway Co. 49 Pa. Super. 106, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Snyder v. Pennsylvania Railroad 49 Pa. Super. 111, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Correll v. Borough 49 Pa. Super. 118, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Kline's Estate 49 Pa. Super. 122, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Buck v. Mutual Building & Loan Ass'n 49 Pa. Super. 128, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Chisolm v. Moore 49 Pa. Super. 132, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Councilman v. Borough 49 Pa. Super. 138, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Bond v. Cole 49 Pa. Super. 144, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Dixon v. Snyder 49 Pa. Super. 148, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Dominco v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America 49 Pa. Super. 156, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Feeney v. Abelson 49 Pa. Super. 163, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Horine v. Luria 49 Pa. Super. 171, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Neumiller v. Acme Motor Car Co. 49 Pa. Super. 183, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Moyer's Estate 49 Pa. Super. 187, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Gilbert v. Johnson 49 Pa. Super. 191, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Schlott v. Borough 49 Pa. Super. 197, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Hartman's Estate 49 Pa. Super. 203, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Rothsville Knitting Mills Assigned Estate 49 Pa. Super. 208, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Wilhelm's Estate 49 Pa. Super. 213, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Braker v. Deuser 49 Pa. Super. 215, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Merritt v. Lehigh Valley Railroad 49 Pa. Super. 219, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Cosgrove v. Woodward 49 Pa. Super. 228, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Sargent v. Hancock Mutual Life Insurance 49 Pa. Super. 239, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Ellis v. Anderson 49 Pa. Super. 245, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Diehl Manufacturing Co. v. Philadelphia Electric Co. 49 Pa. Super. 257, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Cogan v. Bedford County 49 Pa. Super. 262, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Powell v. Wilhelm 49 Pa. Super. 268, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Grange Trust Co. v. Brown 49 Pa. Super. 274, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Commonwealth v. Storey 49 Pa. Super. 282, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Spang's Estate 49 Pa. Super. 314, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Commonwealth v. Moore 49 Pa. Super. 321, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Sipps v. Pusey 49 Pa. Super. 326, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Phœnixville v. Eyrich 49 Pa. Super. 331, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Green v. Simpson 49 Pa. Super. 334, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Glick v. Doyle 49 Pa. Super. 341, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Commonwealth v. Duffy 49 Pa. Super. 344, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Hamill v. Borough 49 Pa. Super. 371, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Mace v. Wilson 49 Pa. Super. 378, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Doylestown & Danborough Turnpike Road Co. v. Philadelphia & Easton Electric Railway Co. 49 Pa. Super. 381, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Heil v. South Easton Water Co. 49 Pa. Super. 384, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Coyle v. Schrull 49 Pa. Super. 386, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Commonwealth v. Clewell 49 Pa. Super. 389, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Commonwealth v. Ignatavig 49 Pa. Super. 397, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Flick's Case 49 Pa. Super. 402, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Metzger's Estate 49 Pa. Super. 406, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Charles D. Kaier Co. 49 Pa. Super. 413, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Lopresti v. Sulkin 49 Pa. Super. 417, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Smith v. Smith 49 Pa. Super. 423, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Bertram v. Petrovsky 49 Pa. Super. 426, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)
- Schneider v. Bates 49 Pa. Super. 430, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1912)