1922
304 Superior Court of Pennsylvania opinions from 1922.
- Flood v. Connor 80 Pa. Super. 54, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Murray v. Grover 80 Pa. Super. 56, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Famous v. Thomas Yearsley Co. 80 Pa. Super. 58, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Durando v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co. 80 Pa. Super. 65, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Fillip v. Wm. Cramp & Sons Ship & Engine Building Co. 80 Pa. Super. 68, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Shamlian v. Waxman 80 Pa. Super. 73, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Sussman Bros. v. Meier 80 Pa. Super. 78, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Moffitt v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp. 80 Pa. Super. 81, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Max v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp. 80 Pa. Super. 86, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Turner's Estate 80 Pa. Super. 88, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Borough of Swarthmore v. Public Service Commission 80 Pa. Super. 99, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Scott v. Scott 80 Pa. Super. 141, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Riddell v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co. 80 Pa. Super. 176, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Holcomb & Hoke Manufacturing Co. v. Gamba 80 Pa. Super. 191, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Holliday v. Potter 80 Pa. Super. 194, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Levison & Co. v. Pine Ridge Coal Co. 80 Pa. Super. 202, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Slavin v. Reilly Roberts 81 Pa. Super. 261, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Continental Guaranty Corp. v. Thomas Hughes, Inc. 81 Pa. Super. 264, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Commonwealth v. Zampogna 81 Pa. Super. 74, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Commonwealth v. Fideli 81 Pa. Super. 79, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Friel-McLeister, Inc. v. Anti-Hydro Waterproofing Co. 80 Pa. Super. 52, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Wallace v. Public Service Commission 80 Pa. Super. 60, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Wagner's Estate 80 Pa. Super. 184, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Huntzinger v. Devlin 80 Pa. Super. 187, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Commonwealth v. Zell Herr 81 Pa. Super. 145, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Commonwealth v. Polise 81 Pa. Super. 69, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Baum v. Goldblatt 81 Pa. Super. 233, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Snowiss v. Elias Loeb & Co. 81 Pa. Super. 124, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Commonwealth v. Gilliam 82 Pa. Super. 75, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Betzko v. Betzko 81 Pa. Super. 231, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Moye v. Morrison 81 Pa. Super. 251, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Commonwealth v. Cauffiel 79 Pa. Super. 596, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Fowler v. Newbold 81 Pa. Super. 227, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Commonwealth v. O'Donnell 81 Pa. Super. 89, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- McCullough v. Phila., Newtown & N. Y. R. R. 81 Pa. Super. 318, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- American Chemical Laboratories v. Wayne Junction Trust Co. 81 Pa. Super. 137, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Progressive C. Co. v. Friedman Balasny 81 Pa. Super. 151, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Philadelphia to Use of Mack Paving & Construction Co. v. Neely 81 Pa. Super. 248, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Philadelphia to Use of Mack Paving & Construction Co. v. Heyer 81 Pa. Super. 243, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Meyers & Joly v. Freiling 81 Pa. Super. 116, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Golden v. Hill 81 Pa. Super. 128, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Hook v. Bell Telephone Co. of Pa. 81 Pa. Super. 120, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Schultz v. Rudman 81 Pa. Super. 239, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- John Wanamaker, Phila. v. Chase 81 Pa. Super. 201, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Fox v. Boorse 81 Pa. Super. 211, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Call 81 Pa. Super. 132, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Lehigh & New England Railroad v. Public Service Commission 79 Pa. Super. 540, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Peoples Natural Gas Co. v. Public Service Commission 79 Pa. Super. 560, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- United Natural Gas Co. v. Public Service Commission 79 Pa. Super. 587, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Mickey v. Hardin 79 Pa. Super. 592, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)