1922
304 Superior Court of Pennsylvania opinions from 1922.
- Borough of Warren v. Public Service Commission 80 Pa. Super. 10, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Thompson, Exrx. v. Barrow 81 Pa. Super. 216, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Bayuk Bros. Inc. v. Wilson Martin Co. 81 Pa. Super. 195, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Sternberg v. Tradesmens National Bank 81 Pa. Super. 199, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Crawford's Estate 81 Pa. Super. 222, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Runyeon v. Eaches 2010 Pa. Super. 267, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Stern v. Lancaster 79 Pa. Super. 27, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Rasp v. Rasp 79 Pa. Super. 29, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Shawkey v. City of Pittsburgh 79 Pa. Super. 31, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Brodsky v. Bell 79 Pa. Super. 36, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Commonwealth v. Allen 79 Pa. Super. 40, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Commonwealth v. Altland 79 Pa. Super. 43, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Commonwealth v. Blank 79 Pa. Super. 49, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Commonwealth v. Bolan 79 Pa. Super. 52, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Commonwealth v. Diamond 79 Pa. Super. 54, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Commonwealth v. Gabel 79 Pa. Super. 59, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Commonwealth v. Longwell 79 Pa. Super. 68, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Commonwealth v. Losey 79 Pa. Super. 75, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Commonwealth v. Zeitler 79 Pa. Super. 81, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Commonwealth v. Zinkeris 79 Pa. Super. 85, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Capwell v. Capwell 79 Pa. Super. 88, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Drum v. Dinkelacker 79 Pa. Super. 91, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Falk Co. v. American Railway Express Co. 79 Pa. Super. 99, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Hotaling v. Fisher 79 Pa. Super. 103, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Jacob Dold Packing Co. v. Potter Title & Trust Co. 79 Pa. Super. 112, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Remley v. Plummer 79 Pa. Super. 117, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Roloson's Estate 79 Pa. Super. 124, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Smith v. Hartman 79 Pa. Super. 126, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Swainbank v. Yoder 79 Pa. Super. 132, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Terry v. Windsor 79 Pa. Super. 134, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Welch v. Harrigan 79 Pa. Super. 138, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Willinsky v. Fulton 79 Pa. Super. 144, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Willinsky v. Fulton 79 Pa. Super. 148, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- W. J. Gilmore Drug Co. v. Goldsmith 79 Pa. Super. 149, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Commonwealth v. Mauk 79 Pa. Super. 153, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Clark v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad 79 Pa. Super. 159, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Commonwealth v. Doe 79 Pa. Super. 162, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Commonwealth v. Ochman & Bernstein 79 Pa. Super. 171, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Commonwealth v. Von Foerster 79 Pa. Super. 174, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Hart v. Altoona & Logan Valley Electric Railway Co. 79 Pa. Super. 180, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- McCray Refrigerator Co. v. Bacso 79 Pa. Super. 185, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Williams v. Williams 79 Pa. Super. 189, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Williams v. City of Uniontown 79 Pa. Super. 193, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Halapy v. Peters Creek Gas Coal Co. 79 Pa. Super. 196, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Amidon v. Harmony Creamery Co. 79 Pa. Super. 206, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Runyeon v. Eaches 79 Pa. Super. 267, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Runyeon v. Eaches 79 Pa. Super. 272, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Commonwealth v. Alderman 79 Pa. Super. 277, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Condren v. Heintz 79 Pa. Super. 283, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)
- Croushore's Estate 79 Pa. Super. 286, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1922)