Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /United States /Cases /U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit /

1909

94 U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit opinions from 1909.

  • Harmon v. Jensen Dec 18, 1909 No. 1,949 176 F. 519; 100 C.C.A. 115; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4983
  • In re National Cash Register Co. Dec 18, 1909 No. 1,961 174 F. 579; 16 Ohio F. Dec. 535; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5222
  • Meyers v. Cheesman Dec 18, 1909 No. 1,953 174 F. 783; 98 C.C.A. 491; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5254
  • Wilkinson v. Prichard Dec 18, 1909 19-5017 145 Iowa 65; 123 N.W. 964
  • Bluegrass Canning Co. v. Steward Dec 14, 1909 Nos. 1,956, 1,957 175 F. 537; 99 C.C.A. 159; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4941
  • City of Owensboro v. Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co. Dec 14, 1909 No. 1,942 174 F. 739; 99 C.C.A. 1; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5249
  • Huntington v. Toledo, St. L. & W. R. Dec 14, 1909 No. 1,931 175 F. 532; 16 Ohio F. Dec. 546; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4940
  • Belding-Hall Mfg. Co. v. Mercer & Ferdon Lumber Co. Dec 7, 1909 No. 1,974 175 F. 335; 99 C.C.A. 123; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4937
  • El Paso Cattle Co. v. Stafford Dec 7, 1909 No. 1,973 176 F. 41; 16 Ohio F. Dec. 465; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4974
  • Lake Shore & M. S. Ry. Co. v. Eder Dec 7, 1909 No. 1,948 174 F. 944; 16 Ohio F. Dec. 497; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5272
  • State ex rel. Lake Shore Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. De Groat Nov 26, 1909 19-101 109 Minn. 168; 123 N.W. 417; 1909 Minn. LEXIS 441
  • Rochford v. Pennsylvania Co. Nov 20, 1909 No. 1,946 174 F. 81; 16 Ohio F. Dec. 411; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5151
  • Chicago Grain Door Co. v. National Malleable Castings Co. Nov 16, 1909 No. 1,938 173 F. 918; 97 C.C.A. 324; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5124
  • Crucible Steel Co. of America v. Holt Nov 16, 1909 174 F. 127; 98 C.C.A. 101; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5157
  • Erie R. v. Schultz Nov 16, 1909 No. 1,922 173 F. 759; 16 Ohio F. Dec. 392; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5103
  • Scofield v. United States ex rel. Bond Nov 16, 1909 No. 1,927 174 F. 1; 16 Ohio F. Dec. 407
  • George A. Shaw & Co. v. Cleveland, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co. Nov 8, 1909 No. 1,936 173 F. 746; 16 Ohio F. Dec. 400; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5101
  • Louisville & N. R. v. Womack Nov 8, 1909 No. 1,947 173 F. 752; 97 C.C.A. 559; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5102
  • Cound v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. Nov 6, 1909 19-101 173 F. 527; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5089
  • Leonard Martin Const. Co. v. Highbarger Nov 2, 1909 No. 1,944 175 F. 340; 16 Ohio F. Dec. 528; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4938
  • Snead v. Scheble Nov 2, 1909 No. 1,937 175 F. 570; 99 C.C.A. 578; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4943
  • C. Crane & Co. v. Sesher Oct 25, 1909 No. 1,939 172 F. 1022; 96 C.C.A. 665; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5047
  • National Dump Car Co. v. Ralston Steel Car Co. Aug 2, 1909 No. 1,926 172 F. 393; 97 C.C.A. 91; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4920
  • Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Toledo, P. C. & L. Ry. Co. Jul 29, 1909 No. 1,868 172 F. 371; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4919
  • Millie Iron Mining Co. v. McKinney Jul 26, 1909 No. 1,905 172 F. 42; 96 C.C.A. 156; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4878
  • Wabash Ry. Co. v. Compton Jul 26, 1909 No. 1,899 172 F. 17; 96 C.C.A. 603; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4876
  • Toledo, St. L. & W. R. v. Bartley Jul 22, 1909 No. 1,918 172 F. 82; 96 C.C.A. 570; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4884
  • In re Leech Jul 19, 1909 No. 1,915 171 F. 622; 96 C.C.A. 424; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4844
  • In re Starks-Ullman Saddlery Co. Jul 19, 1909 No. 1,914 171 F. 834; 96 C.C.A. 506; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4864
  • United States v. Erie R. Jul 14, 1909 Nos. 1,827, 1,830 172 F. 50; 96 C.C.A. 538; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4879
  • Adelbert College of Western Reserve University v. Wabash R. Jul 13, 1909 Nos. 1,907 and 1,908 171 F. 805; 96 C.C.A. 465; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4859
  • Erie R. v. Schomer Jul 13, 1909 No. 1,935 171 F. 798; 96 C.C.A. 458; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4858
  • National Malleable Castings Co. v. Buckeye, Malleable Iron & Coupler Co. Jul 7, 1909 No. 1,910 171 F. 847; 96 C.C.A. 515; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4872
  • Duncan v. Cincinnati Butchers' Supply Co. Jun 29, 1909 No. 1,906 171 F. 656; 96 C.C.A. 400; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4855
  • Duner Co. v. Grand Rapids R. Jun 29, 1909 No. 1,911 171 F. 863; 96 C.C.A. 531; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4873
  • Weber Bros. v. Grand Lodge of Kentucky, F. & A. M Jun 25, 1909 No. 1,901 171 F. 839
  • Electric Controller & Supply Co. v. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. Jun 24, 1909 No. 1,870 171 F. 83; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4809
  • Martin Manion & Co. v. Chattanooga Foundry & Pipe Works Jun 24, 1909 No. 1,919 170 F. 1020; 95 C.C.A. 671; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4785
  • Weber v. Grand Lodge of Kentucky, F. & A. M Jun 24, 1909 No. 1,901 171 F. 839; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4867
  • Swire's Estate Jun 22, 1909 19-5017 225 Pa. 188; 73 A. 1110; 1909 Pa. LEXIS 631
  • Messinger v. Anderson Jun 17, 1909 No. 1,916 171 F. 785; 96 C.C.A. 445; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4857
  • City of Akron v. Barker Asphalt Paving Co. May 28, 1909 Nos. 1,881-1,892 171 F. 29
  • Dietz v. Horton Mfg. Co. May 22, 1909 No. 1,840 170 F. 865; 96 C.C.A. 41; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4752
  • Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. Toledo Boiler Works Co. May 18, 1909 Nos. 1,902 and 1,903 170 F. 81; 95 C.C.A. 363; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4675
  • Gilchrist Transp. Co. v. Phenix Ins. Co. May 15, 1909 No. 1,888 170 F. 279; 16 Ohio F. Dec. 325; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4697
  • Pioneer S. S. Co. v. McCann May 15, 1909 Nos. 1,880 and 1,934 170 F. 873; 96 C.C.A. 49; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4753
  • Weber v. Grand Lodge of Kentucky, F. & A. M. May 13, 1909 No. 1,901 169 F. 522; 95 C.C.A. 20; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4599
  • Pennsylvania Co. v. Whitney May 11, 1909 No. 1,841 169 F. 572; 95 C.C.A. 70; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4608
  • United States Coal Co. v. Pinkerton May 8, 1909 No. 1,869 169 F. 536; 95 C.C.A. 34; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4600
  • Doyle v. United States Apr 20, 1909 No. 1,875 169 F. 625; 95 C.C.A. 153; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4624
« Prev 1 2 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑