Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /United States /Cases /U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit /

1916

152 U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit opinions from 1916.

  • Arizona Copper Estate v. Watts Dec 4, 1916 No. 2663 237 F. 585; 150 C.C.A. 467; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 1982
  • Crane Co. v. Fidelity Trust Co. Dec 4, 1916 No. 2768 238 F. 693; 151 C.C.A. 543; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 1383
  • Examiner Printing Co. v. Aston Dec 4, 1916 No. 2672 238 F. 459; 151 C.C.A. 395; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 1362
  • Smith-Powers Logging Co. v. Bernitt Dec 4, 1916 No. 2591 237 F. 570; 150 C.C.A. 452; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 1978
  • Strong v. Holmes Dec 4, 1916 No. 2648 4 Alaska Fed. 491; 238 F. 554; 151 C.C.A. 490; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 1375
  • Wooldridge v. United States Dec 4, 1916 No. 2839 4 Alaska Fed. 485; 237 F. 775; 150 C.C.A. 529; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 1991
  • Norton v. Shields Nov 15, 1916 16-80101 174 A.D. 804; 161 N.Y.S. 880; 1916 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8319
  • Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. Stewart Nov 13, 1916 No. 2834 237 F. 70; 6 A.L.R. 766; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 1935
  • The C. S. Holmes Nov 13, 1916 No. 2698 237 F. 785; 150 C.C.A. 539; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 1993
  • Western Underwriting & Mortgage Co. v. Valley Bank Nov 13, 1916 No. 2675 237 F. 45; 150 C.C.A. 247; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 1928
  • Willamette & Columbia River Towing Co. v. Hutchison Nov 13, 1916 No. 2835 236 F. 908; 150 C.C.A. 170; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2359
  • Menefee v. United States Nov 6, 1916 No. 2766 236 F. 826; 150 C.C.A. 88; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2344
  • Miller & Lux, Inc. v. Petrocelli Nov 6, 1916 No. 2711 236 F. 846; 150 C.C.A. 108; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2346
  • Southern Pac. Co. v. California Adjustment Co. Nov 6, 1916 237 F. 954; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2010
  • Alaska S. S. Co. v. Gilbert Oct 23, 1916 No. 2829 236 F. 715; 150 C.C.A. 47; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2327
  • Matsumoto v. United States Oct 23, 1916 No. 2782 237 F. 1017; 150 C.C.A. 666; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2030
  • The Virginian Oct 23, 1916 No. 2728 238 F. 156; 151 C.C.A. 232; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 1326
  • J. Homer Fritch, Inc. v. United States Oct 16, 1916 No. 2683 236 F. 133; 149 C.C.A. 343; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2259
  • Sheridan v. United States Oct 16, 1916 No. 2705 236 F. 305; 149 C.C.A. 437; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2278
  • In re Kupfer Corp. Oct 11, 1916 No. 2844 236 F. 1019; 149 C.C.A. 667; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2368
  • Backus v. Owe Sam Goon Oct 9, 1916 No. 2702 235 F. 847; 149 C.C.A. 159; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2224
  • Eggers v. Krueger Oct 9, 1916 No. 2681 236 F. 852; 150 C.C.A. 114; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2347
  • Jacobs v. Hills Oct 9, 1916 No. 2804 235 F. 706; 149 C.C.A. 126; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2218
  • Leib v. Halligan Oct 9, 1916 No. 2747 236 F. 82; 149 C.C.A. 292; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2250
  • Shepard v. United States Oct 4, 1916 No. 2669 236 F. 73; 149 C.C.A. 283; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2249
  • Lee Ling Hing v. United States Oct 3, 1916 No. 2863 236 F. 1019; 149 C.C.A. 668; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2369
  • Soo Hoo Song v. United States Oct 3, 1916 No. 2806 236 F. 1022; 149 C.C.A. 671; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2376
  • Nevada Northern Ry. Co. v. Houston Oct 2, 1916 No. 2826 236 F. 1020; 149 C.C.A. 669; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2372
  • Sacramento Valley Electric R. v. Aston Oct 2, 1916 No. 2670 236 F. 698; 150 C.C.A. 30; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2322
  • United States v. Mahaffey Oct 2, 1916 No. 2738 235 F. 704; 149 C.C.A. 124; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2217
  • Alaska Coast Co. v. Alaska Pacific Fisheries Sep 5, 1916 No. 2647 236 F. 463; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2290; 149 C.C.A. 515
  • Alaska Mexican Gold Mining Co. v. Territory of Alaska Sep 5, 1916 No. 2727 4 Alaska Fed. 451; 236 F. 64; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2247; 149 C.C.A. 274
  • Alaska Pacific Fisheries v. Territory of Alaska Sep 5, 1916 No. 2709 4 Alaska Fed. 432; 236 F. 52; 149 C.C.A. 262; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2244
  • Alaska Pacific Fisheries v. Territory of Alaska Sep 5, 1916 No. 2731 4 Alaska Fed. 460; 236 F. 70; 149 C.C.A. 280; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2248
  • Alaska Salmon Co. v. Territory of Alaska Sep 5, 1916 No. 2720 4 Alaska Fed. 447; 236 F. 62; 149 C.C.A. 272; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2246
  • Alverson v. Oregon-Washington R. & Nav. Co. Sep 5, 1916 No. 2703 236 F. 331; 149 C.C.A. 463; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2281
  • Ames v. Sullivan Sep 5, 1916 No. 2682 4 Alaska Fed. 426; 235 F. 880; 149 C.C.A. 192; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2232
  • Buttner v. Adams Sep 5, 1916 No. 2650 236 F. 105; 149 C.C.A. 315; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2253
  • Columbia Graphophone Co. v. Searchlight Horn Co. Sep 5, 1916 No. 2759 236 F. 135; 149 C.C.A. 345; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2260
  • Ellis v. Treat Sep 5, 1916 No. 2758 4 Alaska Fed. 470; 236 F. 120; 149 C.C.A. 330; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2256
  • Great Northern Ry. Co. v. Ennis Sep 5, 1916 No. 2598 236 F. 17; 149 C.C.A. 227; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2241
  • Hall v. United States Sep 5, 1916 No. 2678 4 Alaska Fed. 422; 235 F. 869; 149 C.C.A. 181; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2228
  • Hoonah Packing Co. v. Territory of Alaska Sep 5, 1916 No. 2713 4 Alaska Fed. 446; 236 F. 61; 149 C.C.A. 271; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2245
  • Irvine v. McDougall Sep 5, 1916 No. 2730 4 Alaska Fed. 430; 235 F. 888; 149 C.C.A. 200; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2235
  • Juneau Ferry & Navigation Co. v. Morgan Sep 5, 1916 No. 2732 4 Alaska Fed. 477; 236 F. 204; 149 C.C.A. 394; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2269
  • Manders v. Wilson Sep 5, 1916 No. 2671 235 F. 878; 149 C.C.A. 190; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2231
  • Marsters v. United States Sep 5, 1916 No. 2654 236 F. 663; 149 C.C.A. 659; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2315
  • Tacoma Ry. & Power Co. v. Cothary Sep 5, 1916 No. 2736 235 F. 872; 149 C.C.A. 184; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2229
  • Thlinket Packing Co. v. United States Sep 5, 1916 No. 2623 4 Alaska Fed. 463; 236 F. 109; 149 C.C.A. 319; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2254
  • Titlow v. McCormick Sep 5, 1916 No. 2653 236 F. 209; 149 C.C.A. 399; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2270
« Prev 1 2 3 4 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑