Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /United States /Cases /U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit /

1916

158 U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit opinions from 1916.

  • San Francisco Breweries, Ltd. v. Brainard 233 F. 45, (9th Cir. 1916)
  • First Nat. Bank v. E. J. Dodge Co. 233 F. 74, (9th Cir. 1916)
  • The Oceania Vance 233 F. 77, (9th Cir. 1916)
  • Caledonian Ins. v. Levy 233 F. 92, (9th Cir. 1916)
  • Wintermote v. MacLafferty 233 F. 95, (9th Cir. 1916)
  • Chew v. Connell 233 F. 220, (9th Cir. 1916)
  • Paine v. Archer 233 F. 259, (9th Cir. 1916)
  • Miller Rubber Co. v. Citizens' Trust & Savings Bank 233 F. 488, (9th Cir. 1916)
  • United States v. Inman-Poulsen Lumber Co. 233 F. 941, (9th Cir. 1916)
  • Equitable Trust Co. v. Western Pac. Ry. Co. 231 F. 571, (9th Cir. 1916)
  • Osterman v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co. 230 F. 1023, (9th Cir. 1916)
  • United States v. Poland 231 F. 810, (9th Cir. 1916)
  • Cresta v. Maxwell 231 F. 448, (9th Cir. 1916)
  • Keyes v. Davie 231 F. 688, (9th Cir. 1916)
  • Nelson v. Patsel 232 F. 682, (9th Cir. 1916)
  • Thomas v. South Butte Mining Co. 230 F. 968, (9th Cir. 1916)
  • Martin v. Freeman 231 F. 87, (9th Cir. 1916)
  • Crane Creek Irr. Dist. v. Portland Wood Pipe Co. 231 F. 113, (9th Cir. 1916)
  • Chan Pong v. United States 230 F. 1021, (9th Cir. 1916)
  • Chan Kam v. United States 230 F. 990, (9th Cir. 1916)
  • Smith v. United States 231 F. 25, (9th Cir. 1916)
  • Moore v. Douglas 230 F. 399, (9th Cir. 1916)
  • Olmsted-Stevenson Co. v. Miller 231 F. 69, (9th Cir. 1916)
  • Olmsted-Stevenson Co. v. Langdorf 231 F. 76, (9th Cir. 1916)
  • Maney Bros. & Co. v. Crane Creek Irrigation, Land & Power Co. 232 F. 77, (9th Cir. 1916)
  • Alaska Northern Ry. Co. v. Municipality of Seward 229 F. 667, (9th Cir. 1916)
  • Pabst Brewing Co. v. E. Clemens Horst Co. 229 F. 913, (9th Cir. 1916)
  • Robbins v. United States 229 F. 987, (9th Cir. 1916)
  • Sherman, Clay & Co. v. Searchlight Horn Co. 229 F. 1022, (9th Cir. 1916)
  • Low Kwai v. Backus 229 F. 481, (9th Cir. 1916)
  • Bistline v. United States 229 F. 546, (9th Cir. 1916)
  • Schultz v. Stack-Gibbs Lumber Co. 229 F. 920, (9th Cir. 1916)
  • United States v. Great Northern Ry. Co. 229 F. 927, (9th Cir. 1916)
  • Scharrenberg v. Dollar S. S. Co. 229 F. 970, (9th Cir. 1916)
  • The Calypso 230 F. 962, (9th Cir. 1916)
  • Worthen Lumber Mills v. Alaska Juneau Gold Mining Co. 229 F. 966, (9th Cir. 1916)
  • Guidoni v. Wheeler 230 F. 93, (9th Cir. 1916)
  • Cloninger v. Finlaison 230 F. 98, (9th Cir. 1916)
  • Ætna Life Ins. v. Portland Gas & Coke Co. 229 F. 552, (9th Cir. 1916)
  • Healy v. Wehrung 229 F. 686, (9th Cir. 1916)
  • Polson Logging Co. v. Neumeyer 229 F. 705, (9th Cir. 1916)
  • Fullinwider v. Southern Pac. R. 229 F. 717, (9th Cir. 1916)
  • Hills v. Joseph 229 F. 865, (9th Cir. 1916)
  • Simpson v. United States 229 F. 940, (9th Cir. 1916)
  • Shields v. Columbia River Lumber Co. 229 F. 979, (9th Cir. 1916)
  • Sierra Land & Live Stock Co. v. Desert Power & Mill Co. 229 F. 982, (9th Cir. 1916)
  • The Hardy 229 F. 985, (9th Cir. 1916)
  • Ryan v. Murphy 229 F. 988, (9th Cir. 1916)
  • Marshall v. Backus 229 F. 1021, (9th Cir. 1916)
  • Oregon-Washington R. & Nav. Co. v. United States 229 F. 1022, (9th Cir. 1916)
« Prev 1 2 3 4 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑