Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /United States /Cases /U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit /

2011

5319 U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit opinions from 2011.

  • James Pinkerton v. J. Woodring 408 F. App'x 19, (9th Cir. 2011)
  • Jose Perez v. State of California 407 F. App'x 235, (9th Cir. 2011)
  • Robert Wahl, Jr. v. Brian Belleque (9th Cir. 2011)
  • Robert Smith, Jr. v. Belinda Stewart 407 F. App'x 237, (9th Cir. 2011)
  • United States v. Salvador Vasquez-Chavez 407 F. App'x 238, (9th Cir. 2011)
  • United States v. Jose Rocha-Encarnacion 407 F. App'x 239, (9th Cir. 2011)
  • United States v. Cesar Dorado-Avila 407 F. App'x 240, (9th Cir. 2011)
  • United States v. Roberto Oliver-Guzman 407 F. App'x 241, (9th Cir. 2011)
  • United States v. Jesus Felix-Burgos 407 F. App'x 245, (9th Cir. 2011)
  • United States v. Rafael Vea-Martinez 407 F. App'x 258, (9th Cir. 2011)
  • United States v. Pedro Araujo-Quinonez 407 F. App'x 255, (9th Cir. 2011)
  • United States v. Santos Garcia-Mendoza 407 F. App'x 261, (9th Cir. 2011)
  • United States v. Zollie Byrd 407 F. App'x 260, (9th Cir. 2011)
  • United States v. Ralph Brown, Iii 407 F. App'x 245, (9th Cir. 2011)
  • United States v. Isaih Veytia 407 F. App'x 248, (9th Cir. 2011)
  • United States v. Juan Cruz-Rodriguez 407 F. App'x 249, (9th Cir. 2011)
  • United States v. Matthew Eaton 407 F. App'x 250, (9th Cir. 2011)
  • United States v. Seggria Broome 407 F. App'x 251, (9th Cir. 2011)
  • United States v. Sandy Ramirez-Krotky 407 F. App'x 262, (9th Cir. 2011)
  • United States v. Alejandro Sanchez 407 F. App'x 259, (9th Cir. 2011)
  • Wahl v. Belleque 407 F. App'x 236, (9th Cir. 2011)
  • United States v. Rico 407 F. App'x 255, (9th Cir. 2011)
  • Teclezghi v. Holder (9th Cir. 2011)
  • United States v. Montes 628 F.3d 1183, (9th Cir. 2011)
  • Hooper v. County of San Diego 629 F.3d 1127, (9th Cir. 2011)
  • UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Augusto 628 F.3d 1175, (9th Cir. 2011)
  • Fier v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of America 629 F.3d 1095, (9th Cir. 2011)
  • Trunk v. City of San Diego 629 F.3d 1099, (9th Cir. 2011)
  • Enyart v. National Conference of Bar Examiners, Inc. 630 F.3d 1153, (9th Cir. 2011)
  • Rosas-Castaneda v. Holder 655 F.3d 875, (9th Cir. 2011)
  • United States v. Liquidators of European Federal Credit Bank 630 F.3d 1139, (9th Cir. 2011)
  • Hamilton v. Brown 630 F.3d 889, (9th Cir. 2011)
  • United States v. Harris 628 F.3d 1203, (9th Cir. 2011)
  • Kristin Perry v. Arnold Schwarzenegger - Memorandum Regarding Motion to Disqualify 630 F.3d 909, (9th Cir. 2011)
  • Kristin Perry v. Arnold Schwarzenegger - Concurrence to the Certification Order and Per Curiam Opinion (9th Cir. 2011)
  • Kristin Perry v. Arnold Schwarzenegger 630 F.3d 898, (9th Cir. 2011)
  • United States v. Montes 628 F.3d 1183, (9th Cir. 2011)
  • United States v. Robert Stoddard, Jr. 407 F. App'x 231, (9th Cir. 2011)
  • United States v. Todd Horob 407 F. App'x 228, (9th Cir. 2011)
  • Elizabeth Powell v. Sherman Hatcher 407 F. App'x 226, (9th Cir. 2011)
  • Optional Capital, Inc. v. Kyung Kim 414 F. App'x 12, (9th Cir. 2011)
  • Zabadi v. Holder 407 F. App'x 219, (9th Cir. 2011)
  • United States v. Eusebio Jimenez-Garcia 407 F. App'x 222, (9th Cir. 2011)
  • Leticia Perez Gonzalez v. Eric H. Holder Jr. 407 F. App'x 223, (9th Cir. 2011)
  • The Dang v. Eric H. Holder Jr. 407 F. App'x 225, (9th Cir. 2011)
  • United States v. Carlos Gonzalez-Salmeron 407 F. App'x 230, (9th Cir. 2011)
  • United States v. David Escobar-Menjivar 407 F. App'x 231, (9th Cir. 2011)
  • United States v. Randy Jangula (9th Cir. 2011)
  • Kristin Perry v. Arnold Schwarzenegger - Order Certifying a Question to the Supreme Court of California 628 F.3d 1191, (9th Cir. 2011)
  • Kristin Perry v. Arnold Schwarzenegger - Memorandum Regarding Motion to Disqualify (9th Cir. 2011)
« Prev 1 … 104 105 106 107 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑