Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /United States /Cases /Court of Claims /

1929

170 Court of Claims opinions from 1929.

  • Newman, Saunders & Co. v. United States 36 F.2d 1009, (1929)
  • Riddle v. United States 38 F.2d 527, (1929)
  • Maneely v. United States 68 Ct. Cl. 623, (1929)
  • Warren ex rel. Estate of Wiggins v. United States 68 Ct. Cl. 634, (1929)
  • Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. United States 68 Ct. Cl. 648, (1929)
  • Maas & Waldstein Co. v. United States 37 F.2d 196, (1929)
  • Oak Worsted Mills v. United States 36 F.2d 529, (1929)
  • Du Puy v. United States 35 F.2d 990, (1929)
  • Hirsh v. United States 35 F.2d 982, (1929)
  • Three-In-One Oil Co. v. United States 35 F.2d 987, (1929)
  • Bew v. United States 35 F.2d 977, (1929)
  • Marvel Products Co. v. United States 35 F.2d 979, (1929)
  • Du Puy v. United States 35 F.2d 990, (1929)
  • Atlantic Refining Co. v. United States 72 Ct. Cl. 1, (1929)
  • Garrett v. United States 68 Ct. Cl. 452, (1929)
  • Brown v. United States 68 Ct. Cl. 458, (1929)
  • Lind v. United States 68 Ct. Cl. 467, (1929)
  • Escher v. United States 68 Ct. Cl. 473, (1929)
  • William S. Gray & Co. v. United States 68 Ct. Cl. 480, (1929)
  • Carroll v. United States 68 Ct. Cl. 500, (1929)
  • Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. United States 68 Ct. Cl. 524, (1929)
  • American Dredging Co. v. United States 68 Ct. Cl. 565, (1929)
  • Du Puy v. United States 68 Ct. Cl. 574, (1929)
  • Nickerson v. United States 68 Ct. Cl. 577, (1929)
  • Iowa Tribe of Indians v. United States 68 Ct. Cl. 585, (1929)
  • Stange v. United States 68 Ct. Cl. 395, (1929)
  • International Paper Co. v. United States 68 Ct. Cl. 414, (1929)
  • W. L. Fain Grain Co. v. United States 68 Ct. Cl. 441, (1929)
  • Sanoff v. United States 68 Ct. Cl. 445, (1929)
  • Stewart-Warner Speedometer Corp. v. United States 68 Ct. Cl. 449, (1929)
  • Foote Bros. Gear & Machine Co. v. United States 69 Ct. Cl. 23, (1929)
  • Stanton v. United States 68 Ct. Cl. 379, (1929)
  • Imperial Brass Manufacturing Co. v. United States 69 Ct. Cl. 20, (1929)
  • Daily Pantagraph, Inc. v. United States 37 F.2d 783, (1929)
  • Southern Pacific Co. v. United States 68 Ct. Cl. 223, (1929)
  • Newcomb v. United States 68 Ct. Cl. 228, (1929)
  • Warner-Patterson Co. v. United States 68 Ct. Cl. 237, (1929)
  • Newcomb v. United States 68 Ct. Cl. 246, (1929)
  • Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v. United States 68 Ct. Cl. 273, (1929)
  • Ordnance Engineering Corp. v. United States 68 Ct. Cl. 301, (1929)
  • Autoquip Manufacturing Co. v. United States 68 Ct. Cl. 362, (1929)
  • Bassick Manufacturing Co. v. United States 68 Ct. Cl. 366, (1929)
  • Bond v. United States 68 Ct. Cl. 369, (1929)
  • Newcomb v. United States 68 Ct. Cl. 371, (1929)
  • Sweet ex rel. Stockholders of the Sweet & Piper Horse & Mule Co. v. United States 68 Ct. Cl. 109, (1929)
  • Roessler v. United States 68 Ct. Cl. 119, (1929)
  • American Stores Co. v. United States 68 Ct. Cl. 128, (1929)
  • Coconut Plantations Co. v. United States 68 Ct. Cl. 139, (1929)
  • E. Edelmann & Co. v. United States 68 Ct. Cl. 168, (1929)
  • Dow Pump & Diesel Engine Co. v. United States 68 Ct. Cl. 175, (1929)
« Prev 1 2 3 4 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑