Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /United States /Cases /Supreme Court of the United States /

1909

208 Supreme Court of the United States opinions from 1909.

  • Sand Filtration Corp. of America v. Cowardin May 3, 1909 123 213 U.S. 360; 29 S. Ct. 509; 53 L. Ed. 833; 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1881
  • Strong v. Repide May 3, 1909 110 213 U.S. 419; 29 S. Ct. 521; 53 L. Ed. 853; 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1883
  • Boquillas Land & Cattle Co. v. Curtis Apr 26, 1909 133 213 U.S. 339; 29 S. Ct. 493; 53 L. Ed. 822; 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1879
  • Donohue v. El Paso & Southwestern Railroad Apr 26, 1909 No. 516 214 U.S. 499
  • Donohue v. EL PASO & SOUTHWESTERN RR Apr 26, 1909 516 214 U.S. 499; 53 L. Ed. 1060; 29 S. Ct. 698; 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1937
  • Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Southern Railway News Co. Apr 26, 1909 165 214 U.S. 498; 29 S. Ct. 699; 53 L. Ed. 1060; 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1936
  • George W. Thomas, in Error v. South Side Elevated Railway Company Apr 26, 1909 157 214 U.S. 496
  • Logan v. FARMERS'DEPOSIT NATIONAL BANK OF PITTSBURGH Apr 26, 1909 745 214 U.S. 500; 29 S. Ct. 698; 53 L. Ed. 1060; 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1938
  • Metropolitan Trust Co. of New York v. Central Trust Co. of New York Apr 26, 1909 No. 804 214 U.S. 516; 29 S. Ct. 697; 53 L. Ed. 1064; 1909 U.S. LEXIS 2063
  • St. Paul, M. & M. Ry. Co. v. Minnesota Apr 26, 1909 162 214 U.S. 497
  • Thomas v. South Side Elevated Railway Co. Apr 26, 1909 No. 157 214 U.S. 496; 29 S. Ct. 698; 53 L. Ed. 1059; 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1934
  • Henshaw v. State Bank Apr 23, 1909 226 of October term, 1905 239 Ill. 515; 88 N.E. 214
  • Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. Henrie Apr 19, 1909 648 214 U.S. 491; 29 S. Ct. 697; 53 L. Ed. 1057; 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1932
  • Leeds & Catlin Co. v. Victor Talking Machine Co. Apr 19, 1909 80 213 U.S. 301; 29 S. Ct. 495; 53 L. Ed. 805; 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1876
  • Leeds & Catlin Company v. Victor Talking Machine Company (No. 2) Apr 19, 1909 81 213 U.S. 325; 29 S. Ct. 503; 53 L. Ed. 816; 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1877
  • MacFadden v. United States Apr 19, 1909 14, Original 213 U.S. 288; 29 S. Ct. 490; 53 L. Ed. 801; 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1874
  • Van Gieson v. Maile Apr 19, 1909 121 213 U.S. 338; 29 S. Ct. 492; 53 L. Ed. 821; 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1878
  • Boise Artesian Hot & Cold Water Co. v. Boise City Apr 12, 1909 131 213 U.S. 276; 29 S. Ct. 426; 53 L. Ed. 796; 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1873
  • Ex Parte: In the Matter of the Consolidated Rubber Tire Company Apr 12, 1909 214 U.S. 490; 53 L. Ed. 1057; 29 S. Ct. 695; 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1930
  • Coder v. Arts Apr 5, 1909 93 213 U.S. 223; 29 S. Ct. 436; 53 L. Ed. 772; 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1869
  • Hepner v. United States Apr 5, 1909 626 213 U.S. 103; 29 S. Ct. 474; 53 L. Ed. 720; 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1858
  • Keerl v. Montana Apr 5, 1909 113 213 U.S. 135; 29 S. Ct. 469; 53 L. Ed. 734; 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1861
  • Keller v. United States Apr 5, 1909 653, 654 213 U.S. 138; 29 S. Ct. 470; 53 L. Ed. 737; 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1862
  • Maiorano v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Apr 5, 1909 103 213 U.S. 268; 29 S. Ct. 424; 53 L. Ed. 792; 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1872
  • MURRAY, McSWEEN, AND PATTON, AS THE STATE DISPENSARY COMMISSION v. STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA Ex Rel. RAY, TRUSTEE Apr 5, 1909 605 213 U.S. 174; 29 S. Ct. 465; 53 L. Ed. 752; 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1864
  • Selliger v. Kentucky Ex Rel. Alexander Apr 5, 1909 115 213 U.S. 200; 29 S. Ct. 449; 53 L. Ed. 761; 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1867
  • Siler v. Illinois Central R. Co. Apr 5, 1909 522, 523, 524 213 U.S. 199; 29 S. Ct. 458; 53 L. Ed. 760; 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1866
  • Turner v. American Security & Trust Co. Apr 5, 1909 101 213 U.S. 257; 29 S. Ct. 420; 53 L. Ed. 788; 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1871
  • United States v. Dickinson Apr 5, 1909 362 213 U.S. 92; 29 S. Ct. 485; 53 L. Ed. 711; 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1857
  • United States v. Mason Apr 5, 1909 642 213 U.S. 115; 29 S. Ct. 480; 53 L. Ed. 725; 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1859
  • Missouri v. Kansas Mar 22, 1909 6, Original 213 U.S. 78; 29 S. Ct. 417; 53 L. Ed. 706; 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1855
  • Sass & Crawford, in Error v. Minnie Thomas and Charley Thomas Mar 22, 1909 112 214 U.S. 489; 29 S. Ct. 695
  • DeHaven v. Pratt Mar 8, 1909 79-48 223 Pa. 633; 72 A. 1068; 1909 Pa. LEXIS 591
  • Mammoth Mining Co. v. Grand Central Mining Co. Mar 8, 1909 97 213 U.S. 72; 29 S. Ct. 413; 53 L. Ed. 702; 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1854
  • Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Sowers Mar 1, 1909 64 213 U.S. 55; 29 S. Ct. 397; 53 L. Ed. 695; 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1853
  • Ex Parte: In the Matter of Frank McWilliams Mar 1, 1909 214 U.S. 488; 53 L. Ed. 1057; 29 S. Ct. 693; 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1928
  • Ex Parte: In the Matter of the Hudson Oil & Supply Company Mar 1, 1909 214 U.S. 487; 29 S. Ct. 693; 53 L. Ed. 1057; 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1927
  • Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Wilson Mar 1, 1909 65 213 U.S. 52; 29 S. Ct. 403; 53 L. Ed. 693; 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1852
  • American Express Co. v. Mullins Feb 23, 1909 77 212 U.S. 311; 29 S. Ct. 381; 53 L. Ed. 525; 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1815
  • Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Calhoun Feb 23, 1909 71 213 U.S. 1; 29 S. Ct. 321; 53 L. Ed. 671; 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1848
  • Bagley v. General Fire Extinguisher Co. Feb 23, 1909 96 212 U.S. 477; 29 S. Ct. 341; 53 L. Ed. 605; 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1831
  • Bradford v. Morrison Feb 23, 1909 60 212 U.S. 389; 29 S. Ct. 349; 53 L. Ed. 564; 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1821
  • Davidson Bros. Marble Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Gibson Feb 23, 1909 78 213 U.S. 10; 29 S. Ct. 324; 53 L. Ed. 675; 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1849
  • Ex Parte: In the Matter of the Dowagiac Manufacturing Company Feb 23, 1909 212 U.S. 569
  • Frederic L. Grant Shoe Co. v. W. M. Laird Co. Feb 23, 1909 35 212 U.S. 445; 29 S. Ct. 332; 53 L. Ed. 591; 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1827
  • Fritzlen v. Boatmen's Bank Feb 23, 1909 99 212 U.S. 364; 29 S. Ct. 366; 53 L. Ed. 551; 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1819
  • H. v. Mercer, Trustees, Etc. v. Monitor Drill Company Feb 23, 1909 617 212 U.S. 590
  • Hammond Packing Co. v. Arkansas Feb 23, 1909 54 212 U.S. 322; 29 S. Ct. 370; 53 L. Ed. 530; 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1817
  • Johnson v. Mueser Feb 23, 1909 67 212 U.S. 283; 29 S. Ct. 390; 53 L. Ed. 514; 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1811
  • Juragua Iron Co. v. United States Feb 23, 1909 34 212 U.S. 297; 29 S. Ct. 385; 53 L. Ed. 520; 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1814
« Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑