Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /United States /Cases /Supreme Court of the United States /

1922

256 Supreme Court of the United States opinions from 1922.

  • New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. Fruchter 260 U.S. 141, (1922)
  • Ohio Ex Rel. Seney v. Swift & Co. 260 U.S. 146, (1922)
  • The Sao Vicente 260 U.S. 151, (1922)
  • Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. 260 U.S. 156, (1922)
  • Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. Settle 260 U.S. 166, (1922)
  • Zucht v. King 260 U.S. 174, (1922)
  • Takao Ozawa v. United States 260 U.S. 178, (1922)
  • Takuji Yamashita v. Hinkle 260 U.S. 199, (1922)
  • Gaston, Williams & Wigmore of Canada, Ltd. v. Warner 260 U.S. 201, (1922)
  • Southern Pacific Co. v. Olympian Dredging Co. 260 U.S. 205, (1922)
  • Board of Trade of the City of Chicago Et Al. v. Charles F. Clyne, United States District Attorney, Etc., Et Al. 260 U.S. 704, (1922)
  • Aktieselskabet Fido v. The Lloyd Brazileiro 260 U.S. 737, (1922)
  • Freund v. United States 260 U.S. 60, (1922)
  • Border National Bank of Eagle Pass v. American National Bank of San Francisco 260 U.S. 701, (1922)
  • United States v. Wong Sing 260 U.S. 18, (1922)
  • Jackman v. Rosenbaum Co. 260 U.S. 22, (1922)
  • Interstate Commerce Commission v. United States Ex Rel. Members of Waste Merchants Ass'n of New York 260 U.S. 32, (1922)
  • Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Louisiana Public Service Commission 260 U.S. 698, (1922)
  • West Side Irrigating Co. v. Chase 260 U.S. 699, (1922)
  • Davis v. Baechtel 260 U.S. 699, (1922)
  • Porto Rico Railway, Light & Power Co. v. Camunas 260 U.S. 700, (1922)
  • Hunt v. City of New Orleans 260 U.S. 700, (1922)
  • Lederer v. Stockton 260 U.S. 3, (1922)
  • Charlotte Harbor & Northern Railway Co. v. Welles 260 U.S. 8, (1922)
  • Knights v. Jackson 260 U.S. 12, (1922)
  • North Carolina Railroad v. Lee 260 U.S. 16, (1922)
  • Department of Trade & Commerce of Nebraska v. Hertz 260 U.S. 696, (1922)
  • New York ex rel. Pierce-Arrow Motor Car Co. v. Knapp 260 U.S. 696, (1922)
  • Donley v. Van Horn 260 U.S. 697, (1922)
  • Alabama & Vicksburg Railway Co. v. Dennis 260 U.S. 726, (1922)
  • State of Wyoming v. State of Colorado 260 U.S. 1, (1922)
  • A. Bourjois & Co., Inc. v. Katzel 260 U.S. 689, (1922)
  • Seth Gettys, Etc., in Error v. Silvan Newburger, Joseph Newburger 260 U.S. 693, (1922)
  • Gettys v. Newburger 260 U.S. 693, (1922)
  • Altitude Oil Co. v. Colorado 260 U.S. 693, (1922)
  • Trustees of United States-Mexico Oil Co. v. Harris 260 U.S. 694, (1922)
  • McIntosh v. Dill 260 U.S. 694, (1922)
  • Mueller v. Adler 260 U.S. 694, (1922)
  • Connors v. Illinois 260 U.S. 695, (1922)
  • United States Ex Rel. Creary v. Weeks 259 U.S. 336, (1922)
  • United Mine Workers v. Coronado Coal Co. 259 U.S. 344, (1922)
  • Ex Parte Harley-Davidson Motor Co. 259 U.S. 414, (1922)
  • Wyoming v. Colorado 259 U.S. 419, (1922)
  • Weiland v. Pioneer Irrigation Co. 259 U.S. 498, (1922)
  • Ward & Gow v. Krinsky 259 U.S. 503, (1922)
  • Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Cheek 259 U.S. 530, (1922)
  • Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Perry 259 U.S. 548, (1922)
  • Lipke v. Lederer 259 U.S. 557, (1922)
  • Oklahoma v. Texas 259 U.S. 565, (1922)
  • State of Georgia v. State of South Carolina 259 U.S. 572, (1922)
« Prev 1 2 3 4 … 6 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑