Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /Washington /Cases /Washington Supreme Court /

2009

449 Washington Supreme Court opinions from 2009.

  • City of Federal Way v. Koenig 217 P.3d 1172, (Wash. 2009)
  • Post v. City of Tacoma 167 Wash. 2d 300, (Wash. 2009)
  • State v. King 219 P.3d 642, (Wash. 2009)
  • City of Federal Way v. Koenig 167 Wash. 2d 341, (Wash. 2009)
  • ABBEY ROAD GROUP v. City of Bonney Lake 218 P.3d 180, (Wash. 2009)
  • In re Pullman 218 P.3d 913, (Wash. 2009)
  • State v. Momah 217 P.3d 321, (Wash. 2009)
  • In re Detention of Strand 217 P.3d 1159, (Wash. 2009)
  • State v. Iniguez 217 P.3d 768, (Wash. 2009)
  • State v. Strode 217 P.3d 310, (Wash. 2009)
  • State v. Momah 167 Wash. 2d 140, (Wash. 2009)
  • In re the Detention of Strand 167 Wash. 2d 180, (Wash. 2009)
  • In re the Personal Restraint of Pullman 167 Wash. 2d 205, (Wash. 2009)
  • State v. Strode 167 Wash. 2d 222, (Wash. 2009)
  • Abbey Road Group, LLC v. City of Bonney Lake 167 Wash. 2d 242, (Wash. 2009)
  • State v. Iniguez 167 Wash. 2d 273, (Wash. 2009)
  • In re Detention of Moore 216 P.3d 1015, (Wash. 2009)
  • State v. Kenyon 216 P.3d 1024, (Wash. 2009)
  • In re Marshall 217 P.3d 291, (Wash. 2009)
  • State v. O'HARA 217 P.3d 756, (Wash. 2009)
  • In re the Detention of Moore 167 Wash. 2d 113, (Wash. 2009)
  • State v. Kenyon 167 Wash. 2d 130, (Wash. 2009)
  • In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Marshall 167 Wash. 2d 51, (Wash. 2009)
  • State v. O'Hara 167 Wash. 2d 91, (Wash. 2009)
  • State v. Hill 217 P.3d 755, (Wash. 2009)
  • State v. Gonzales 217 P.3d 755, (Wash. 2009)
  • State v. Kilgore 216 P.3d 393, (Wash. 2009)
  • Noble v. SAFE HARBOR PRESERVATION TRUST 216 P.3d 1007, (Wash. 2009)
  • Ambach v. French 216 P.3d 405, (Wash. 2009)
  • Noble v. Safe Harbor Family Preservation Trust 167 Wash. 2d 11, (Wash. 2009)
  • Ambach v. French 167 Wash. 2d 167, (Wash. 2009)
  • State v. Kilgore 167 Wash. 2d 28, (Wash. 2009)
  • Putman v. Wenatchee Valley Medical Center 216 P.3d 374, (Wash. 2009)
  • State v. Eriksen 216 P.3d 382, (Wash. 2009)
  • Kappelman v. Lutz 217 P.3d 286, (Wash. 2009)
  • Putman v. Wenatchee Valley Medical Center, PS 166 Wash. 2d 974, (Wash. 2009)
  • Kappelman v. Lutz 217 P.3d 286, (Wash. 2009)
  • State v. Heddrick 215 P.3d 201, (Wash. 2009)
  • State v. Eriksen 166 Wash. 2d 953, (Wash. 2009)
  • Armantrout v. Carlson 214 P.3d 914, (Wash. 2009)
  • In re Soapes 235 P.3d 800, (Wash. 2009)
  • City of Seattle v. St. John 215 P.3d 194, (Wash. 2009)
  • DOT FOODS v. Washington Dept. of Revenue 215 P.3d 185, (Wash. 2009)
  • State v. Heddrick 215 P.3d 201, (Wash. 2009)
  • Dot Foods, Inc. v. Department of Revenue 166 Wash. 2d 912, (Wash. 2009)
  • Armantrout v. Carlson 166 Wash. 2d 931, (Wash. 2009)
  • City of Seattle v. St. John 166 Wash. 2d 941, (Wash. 2009)
  • State v. Reeves 217 P.3d 1158, (Wash. 2009)
  • State v. HUFFERD-OUELLETTE 217 P.3d 1159, (Wash. 2009)
  • State v. Haight 217 P.3d 755, (Wash. 2009)
« Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 … 9 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑