Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /Indiana /Cases /Indiana Court of Appeals /

1912

254 Indiana Court of Appeals opinions from 1912.

  • Swain v. Hunt 99 N.E. 529, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Catholic Order of Foresters v. Collins 99 N.E. 745, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Clendenin v. Pickett 99 N.E. 530, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Osborn v. Adams Brick Co. 99 N.E. 530, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Marks v. Mariotte 99 N.E. 501, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Johnson 99 N.E. 508, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Lawlor v. State ex rel. Shatto 99 N.E. 487, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Wheeler v. Loesch 99 N.E. 502, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Foust 99 N.E. 493, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Laatsch v. Andree 99 N.E. 451, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Jones 99 N.E. 503, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Walter A. Wood Reaping & Mowing Manufacturing Co. v. Angemeier 99 N.E. 500, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Nichols 99 N.E. 497, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Rutherford School Township v. Craney 99 N.E. 485, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Patterson v. Southern Railway Co. 99 N.E. 491, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Colson 99 N.E. 433, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Nelson v. McKee 99 N.E. 447, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Princeton Coal & Mining Co. v. Gilchrist 99 N.E. 426, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Houk v. Citizens National Bank 99 N.E. 437, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Stimson v. Rountree 99 N.E. 439, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Scott v. Scott 99 N.E. 435, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Drimmie v. Hendrickson 99 N.E. 436, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Heritage v. Heritage 99 N.E. 442, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Griffith v. Felts 99 N.E. 432, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Marion Light & Heating Co. v. Vermillion 99 N.E. 55, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Hubbard v. Burnet-Lewis Lumber Co. 98 N.E. 1011, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Willan v. Richardson 98 N.E. 1094, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Mitten v. Caswell-Runyan Co. 99 N.E. 47, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Model Automobile Co. v. Sterling 99 N.E. 51, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Huber Manufacturing Co. v. Blessing 99 N.E. 132, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Federal Life Insurance v. Lillibridge 98 N.E. 1015, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Modern Woodmen of America v. Jones 98 N.E. 1006, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Wabash Railroad v. McNown 99 N.E. 126, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Outcault Advertising Co. v. Harry Joseph Clothing Co. 98 N.E. 1005, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • McConnell v. Ryan 98 N.E. 1004, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Koehler v. Harmon 98 N.E. 1009, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Morton v. Gaffield 98 N.E. 1007, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Hubbard v. Reilly 98 N.E. 886, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Weidenhammer v. McAdams 98 N.E. 883, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Anderson v. Leonard 98 N.E. 891, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Shirley v. Grove 98 N.E. 874, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Aetna Indemnity Co. v. Indiana Fuel Supply Co. 98 N.E. 906, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Brashears v. Perry County Farmers Protective Insurance 98 N.E. 889, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • German American Trust Co. v. Lafayette Box Board & Paper Co. 98 N.E. 874, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Butcher v. Greene 98 N.E. 876, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Larrance v. Lewis 98 N.E. 892, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Cropper v. Glidewell 98 N.E. 1012, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Bragg v. Eagan 98 N.E. 835, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Ladoga Canning Co. v. Corydon Canning Co. 98 N.E. 849, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Hughes v. State ex rel. Sutton 98 N.E. 839, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
« Prev 1 2 3 4 … 6 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑