Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /Indiana /Cases /Indiana Court of Appeals /

1912

254 Indiana Court of Appeals opinions from 1912.

  • Angola Railway & Power Co. v. Butz 98 N.E. 818, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Smith v. Hunt 98 N.E. 841, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Smith v. Andrew 98 N.E. 734, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Indiana Natural Gas & Oil Co. v. Harper 98 N.E. 743, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Milligan v. Arnold 98 N.E. 822, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Steele v. Spaunhurst 98 N.E. 733, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Marion County Construction Co.v. Claycomb 98 N.E. 744, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Evansville & Southern Traction Co. v. Montgomery 98 N.E. 731, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Lyons 98 N.E. 824, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Vandalia Coal Co. v. Haverkamp 98 N.E. 643, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. Myers 98 N.E. 654, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • American Surety Co. v. State ex rel. Souers 98 N.E. 829, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Evansville Suburban & Newburgh Railway Co. v. Evansville & Eastern Electric Railway 98 N.E. 649, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Taylor v. Campbell 98 N.E. 657, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Dixon v. Thompson 98 N.E. 738, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. Beals 98 N.E. 453, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Patterson v. Middle School Township 98 N.E. 440, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Beeson v. Pierce 98 N.E. 380, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Carson v. Hanawalt 98 N.E. 448, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Indianapolis Southern Railroad v. Tucker 98 N.E. 431, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Cooper v. Haseltine 98 N.E. 437, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. Huddleston 98 N.E. 382, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Henderson v. Bivens 98 N.E. 421, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Toner v. Whybrew 98 N.E. 450, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • High Wheel Auto Parts Co. v. Journal Co. 98 N.E. 442, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Thurman v. Miller 98 N.E. 379, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Beech Grove Improvement Co. v. Title Guaranty & Surety Co. 98 N.E. 373, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Ragle v. Dedman 98 N.E. 367, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Harness v. Harness 98 N.E. 357, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Rump v. Woods 98 N.E. 369, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. Malott 98 N.E. 382, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • F. Bimel Co. v. Harter 98 N.E. 360, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Southern Railway Co. v. Utz 98 N.E. 375, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Barker v. McClelland 98 N.E. 300, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Barrett v. Sipp 98 N.E. 310, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Essex v. Hopkins 98 N.E. 307, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Hubbard v. Ranje 98 N.E. 314, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Cincinnati, Lawrenceburg & Aurora Electric Street Railroad v. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad 98 N.E. 304, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Boggs v. Toney 98 N.E. 306, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Hudson v. Indiana Union Traction Co. 98 N.E. 188, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Studabaker v. Faylor 98 N.E. 318, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • St. Clair v. Princeton Coal Mining Co. 98 N.E. 197, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Hughes v. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. 98 N.E. 317, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Cronin v. Logansport Daily Reporter Co. 98 N.E. 303, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Bennett v. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. 98 N.E. 192, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Jennings v. South Whitley Hoop Co. 98 N.E. 194, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Moon v. School City of South Bend 98 N.E. 153, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Myers v. Winona Interurban Railway Co. 98 N.E. 131, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • City of Bloomington v. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. 98 N.E. 188, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. Trustees of Tunnelton Lodge No. 168, K. of P. 98 N.E. 141, (Ind. Ct. App. 1912)
« Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑