Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /North Carolina /Cases /Supreme Court of North Carolina /

1902

314 Supreme Court of North Carolina opinions from 1902.

  • Willard Mfg. Co. v. George H. Tirney & Co. 41 S.E. 871, (N.C. 1902)
  • Sharpe v. Southern Railway Co. 41 S.E. 799, (N.C. 1902)
  • Collier v. Burgin. 41 S.E. 874, (N.C. 1902)
  • Lynn v. Cotton Mills. 41 S.E. 877, (N.C. 1902)
  • Crater v. Ryan. 41 S.E. 800, (N.C. 1902)
  • In Re Smith 41 S.E. 802, (N.C. 1902)
  • Taylor v. Huff. 41 S.E. 873, (N.C. 1902)
  • State v. Sumner 41 S.E. 803, (N.C. 1902)
  • Gwaltney v. Provident Savings Life Assurance Society 41 S.E. 795, (N.C. 1902)
  • Willard Mfg. Co. v. Merchants National Bank 41 S.E. 870, (N.C. 1902)
  • Lumber Co. v. . Iron Works 41 S.E. 797, (N.C. 1902)
  • Orr v. Southern Bell Telephone Co. 41 S.E. 880, (N.C. 1902)
  • S. v. . Peak 41 S.E. 887, (N.C. 1902)
  • McNeely v. North Carolina Mica, Mineral & Lumber Co. 41 S.E. 801, (N.C. 1902)
  • Strain v. Fitzgerald. 41 S.E. 872, (N.C. 1902)
  • Phillips v. Wilmington & Weldon Railroad 41 S.E. 805, (N.C. 1902)
  • Raiford v. Wilmington & Weldon Railroad 41 S.E. 806, (N.C. 1902)
  • Pender Lumber Co. v. Wilmington Iron Works 130 N.C. 584, (N.C. 1902)
  • State v. Peak 130 N.C. 711, (N.C. 1902)
  • State v. Woodruff 52 A. 294, (N.C. 1902)
  • Harris v. Woodard. 41 S.E. 790, (N.C. 1902)
  • Johnson v. Armfield. 41 S.E. 705, (N.C. 1902)
  • Green v. Green. 41 S.E. 784, (N.C. 1902)
  • Perry v. Commissioners of Chatham County 41 S.E. 787, (N.C. 1902)
  • McKenzie v. Houston. 41 S.E. 780, (N.C. 1902)
  • State v. Monds 41 S.E. 789, (N.C. 1902)
  • Fuller v. Jenkins. 41 S.E. 706, (N.C. 1902)
  • Barger v. . Hickory 41 S.E. 708, (N.C. 1902)
  • State v. Coates 41 S.E. 706, (N.C. 1902)
  • Sims v. Norfolk & Western Railroad 41 S.E. 673, (N.C. 1902)
  • Broom v. Broom. 41 S.E. 673, (N.C. 1902)
  • Barger v. City of Hickory 130 N.C. 550, (N.C. 1902)
  • State v. Ellsworth 41 S.E. 548, (N.C. 1902)
  • State v. Briggs 41 S.E. 676, (N.C. 1902)
  • Lacy v. Webb. 41 S.E. 549, (N.C. 1902)
  • Lewis v. Covington. 41 S.E. 677, (N.C. 1902)
  • State v. Flemming 41 S.E. 549, (N.C. 1902)
  • Cogdell v. . R. R. 41 S.E. 541, (N.C. 1902)
  • Hutchins v. Planters National Bank of Richmond 41 S.E. 487, (N.C. 1902)
  • State v. Conly 41 S.E. 534, (N.C. 1902)
  • Smith v. . R. R. 41 S.E. 481, (N.C. 1902)
  • State v. Thompson 41 S.E. 486, (N.C. 1902)
  • Rodman-Heath Cotton Mills v. Town of Waxhaw 41 S.E. 488, (N.C. 1902)
  • Markham v. Southern Conservatory of Music 41 S.E. 531, (N.C. 1902)
  • Smith v. Wilmington & Weldon Railroad 130 N.C. 304, (N.C. 1902)
  • Cogdell v. Wilmington & Weldon Railroad 130 N.C. 313, (N.C. 1902)
  • McNeill v. Durham & Charlotte Railroad 41 S.E. 383, (N.C. 1902)
  • Peebles v. Graham. 41 S.E. 385, (N.C. 1902)
  • Rosser v. Western Union Telegraph Co. 41 S.E. 378, (N.C. 1902)
  • Faircloth v. Borden. 41 S.E. 381, (N.C. 1902)
« Prev 1 … 3 4 5 6 7 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑