Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /North Carolina /Cases /Supreme Court of North Carolina /

1902

348 Supreme Court of North Carolina opinions from 1902.

  • Sims v. Norfolk & Western Railroad 41 S.E. 673, (N.C. 1902)
  • Broom v. Broom. 41 S.E. 673, (N.C. 1902)
  • Barger v. City of Hickory 130 N.C. 550, (N.C. 1902)
  • State v. Ellsworth 41 S.E. 548, (N.C. 1902)
  • Clinard v. Brummell. 41 S.E. 675, (N.C. 1902)
  • State v. Briggs 41 S.E. 676, (N.C. 1902)
  • Lacy v. Webb. 41 S.E. 549, (N.C. 1902)
  • Lewis v. Covington. 41 S.E. 677, (N.C. 1902)
  • State v. Flemming 41 S.E. 549, (N.C. 1902)
  • Cogdell v. . R. R. 41 S.E. 541, (N.C. 1902)
  • Zachary v. Perry. 41 S.E. 533, (N.C. 1902)
  • Hutchins v. Planters National Bank of Richmond 41 S.E. 487, (N.C. 1902)
  • State v. Conly 41 S.E. 534, (N.C. 1902)
  • Morton v. Western Union Telegraph Co. 41 S.E. 484, (N.C. 1902)
  • Smith v. . R. R. 41 S.E. 481, (N.C. 1902)
  • Fritz v. Southern Railway Co. 41 S.E. 532, (N.C. 1902)
  • State v. Thompson 41 S.E. 486, (N.C. 1902)
  • Rodman-Heath Cotton Mills v. Town of Waxhaw 41 S.E. 488, (N.C. 1902)
  • Markham v. Southern Conservatory of Music 41 S.E. 531, (N.C. 1902)
  • Smith v. Wilmington & Weldon Railroad 130 N.C. 304, (N.C. 1902)
  • Cogdell v. Wilmington & Weldon Railroad 130 N.C. 313, (N.C. 1902)
  • McNeill v. Durham & Charlotte Railroad 41 S.E. 383, (N.C. 1902)
  • Peebles v. Graham. 41 S.E. 385, (N.C. 1902)
  • Rosser v. Western Union Telegraph Co. 41 S.E. 378, (N.C. 1902)
  • Faircloth v. Borden. 41 S.E. 381, (N.C. 1902)
  • Graham v. Carr. 41 S.E. 379, (N.C. 1902)
  • Reiger v. Worth. 41 S.E. 377, (N.C. 1902)
  • Olmstead v. City of Raleigh 41 S.E. 292, (N.C. 1902)
  • Robinson v. McDowell. 41 S.E. 287, (N.C. 1902)
  • Moore v. Navassa Guano Co. 41 S.E. 293, (N.C. 1902)
  • State v. Howie 41 S.E. 291, (N.C. 1902)
  • Ex Parte Watts 41 S.E. 289, (N.C. 1902)
  • State v. Foster 41 S.E. 284, (N.C. 1902)
  • State v. Maultsby 41 S.E. 97, (N.C. 1902)
  • Hybart v. Jones. 41 S.E. 293, (N.C. 1902)
  • State v. Buchanan 41 S.E. 107, (N.C. 1902)
  • Phifer v. Ford. 41 S.E. 280, (N.C. 1902)
  • Armstrong v. Stedman. 41 S.E. 278, (N.C. 1902)
  • Brinkley v. Smith. 41 S.E. 106, (N.C. 1902)
  • Bailey v. City of Raleigh 41 S.E. 281, (N.C. 1902)
  • Wilmington Underwriters Insurance v. Stedman 41 S.E. 279, (N.C. 1902)
  • Herring v. Armwood. 41 S.E. 96, (N.C. 1902)
  • State v. Holleman 41 S.E. 99, (N.C. 1902)
  • Cook v. American Exchange Bank 41 S.E. 67, (N.C. 1902)
  • Shell v. West. 41 S.E. 65, (N.C. 1902)
  • State v. Battle 41 S.E. 66, (N.C. 1902)
  • Cooper v. Rouse. 41 S.E. 98, (N.C. 1902)
  • Davis v. Butters Lumber Co. 41 S.E. 95, (N.C. 1902)
  • Springs v. Southern Railway Co. 41 S.E. 100, (N.C. 1902)
  • Ezzell v. Rowland Lumber Co. 41 S.E. 99, (N.C. 1902)
« Prev 1 … 4 5 6 7 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑