Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /North Carolina /Cases /Supreme Court of North Carolina /

1902

314 Supreme Court of North Carolina opinions from 1902.

  • Graham v. Carr. 41 S.E. 379, (N.C. 1902)
  • Reiger v. Worth. 41 S.E. 377, (N.C. 1902)
  • Olmstead v. City of Raleigh 41 S.E. 292, (N.C. 1902)
  • Robinson v. McDowell. 41 S.E. 287, (N.C. 1902)
  • Moore v. Navassa Guano Co. 41 S.E. 293, (N.C. 1902)
  • State v. Maultsby 41 S.E. 97, (N.C. 1902)
  • Hybart v. Jones. 41 S.E. 293, (N.C. 1902)
  • State v. Buchanan 41 S.E. 107, (N.C. 1902)
  • Phifer v. Ford. 41 S.E. 280, (N.C. 1902)
  • Armstrong v. Stedman. 41 S.E. 278, (N.C. 1902)
  • Brinkley v. Smith. 41 S.E. 106, (N.C. 1902)
  • Bailey v. City of Raleigh 41 S.E. 281, (N.C. 1902)
  • Wilmington Underwriters Insurance v. Stedman 41 S.E. 279, (N.C. 1902)
  • State v. Holleman 41 S.E. 99, (N.C. 1902)
  • Cook v. American Exchange Bank 41 S.E. 67, (N.C. 1902)
  • Shell v. West. 41 S.E. 65, (N.C. 1902)
  • State v. Battle 41 S.E. 66, (N.C. 1902)
  • Cooper v. Rouse. 41 S.E. 98, (N.C. 1902)
  • Davis v. Butters Lumber Co. 41 S.E. 95, (N.C. 1902)
  • Ezzell v. Rowland Lumber Co. 41 S.E. 99, (N.C. 1902)
  • Owens v. Williams. 41 S.E. 93, (N.C. 1902)
  • Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. v. Kirven 41 S.E. 1, (N.C. 1902)
  • Davis Sulphur Ore Co. v. Powers 41 S.E. 6, (N.C. 1902)
  • Harcum v. Marsh. 41 S.E. 6, (N.C. 1902)
  • Thomas v. Cooksey. 41 S.E. 2, (N.C. 1902)
  • Sallenger v. Perry. 41 S.E. 11, (N.C. 1902)
  • Tucker v. Winders. 41 S.E. 8, (N.C. 1902)
  • Thompson v. Southern Railway Co. 41 S.E. 9, (N.C. 1902)
  • Williams v. Town of Greenville 40 S.E. 977, (N.C. 1902)
  • State v. Hopkins 40 S.E. 973, (N.C. 1902)
  • Williams v. . R. R. 40 S.E. 979, (N.C. 1902)
  • Smith v. Ingram. 40 S.E. 984, (N.C. 1902)
  • Sun Life Insurance v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 40 S.E. 975, (N.C. 1902)
  • State v. Telfair 40 S.E. 976, (N.C. 1902)
  • Williams v. Southern Railway Co. 130 N.C. 116, (N.C. 1902)
  • Cowell v. . Gregory 40 S.E. 849, (N.C. 1902)
  • Holley v. Smith. 40 S.E. 847, (N.C. 1902)
  • Peterson v. City of Wilmington 40 S.E. 853, (N.C. 1902)
  • Harrington v. Hatton. 40 S.E. 848, (N.C. 1902)
  • Pitt County Board of School Directors v. Town of Greenville 40 S.E. 847, (N.C. 1902)
  • Hardee v. Weathington. 40 S.E. 855, (N.C. 1902)
  • Cowell v. Gregory 130 N.C. 80, (N.C. 1902)
  • Vann v. Edwards. 40 S.E. 853, (N.C. 1902)
  • Lamb v. Baxter. 40 S.E. 850, (N.C. 1902)
  • Armstrong v. Wilmington & Weldon Railroad 40 S.E. 856, (N.C. 1902)
  • Winslow v. Benton. 40 S.E. 840, (N.C. 1902)
  • Barden v. Stickney. 40 S.E. 842, (N.C. 1902)
  • Spruill v. Branning Manufacturing Co. 40 S.E. 824, (N.C. 1902)
  • Zimmerman v. Lynch. 40 S.E. 841, (N.C. 1902)
  • Finch v. Strickland. 40 S.E. 841, (N.C. 1902)
« Prev 1 … 4 5 6 7 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑