1894
345 Court of Civil Appeals of Texas opinions from 1894.
- Blanks v. Ripley 27 S.W. 732, (Tex. App. 1894)
- Johnson v. Halley 27 S.W. 750, (Tex. App. 1894)
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Teague 27 S.W. 958, (Tex. App. 1894)
- Barton v. American National Bank 29 S.W. 210, (Tex. App. 1894)
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Bryant 27 S.W. 825, (Tex. App. 1894)
- Casentini v. Schneider Bros. 27 S.W. 883, (Tex. App. 1894)
- Howe, Receiver v. St. Clair 27 S.W. 800, (Tex. App. 1894)
- City of Corpus Christi v. Central Whare & Warehouse Co. 27 S.W. 803, (Tex. App. 1894)
- Corley v. Goll 27 S.W. 819, (Tex. App. 1894)
- Milmo National Bank v. Convery 27 S.W. 828, (Tex. App. 1894)
- Smith v. Anderson 27 S.W. 775, (Tex. App. 1894)
- International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. Wentworth 27 S.W. 680, (Tex. App. 1894)
- Haswell v. Forbes 27 S.W. 566, (Tex. App. 1894)
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Perry 27 S.W. 496, (Tex. App. 1894)
- Hayslip v. Pomeroy 32 S.W. 124, (Tex. App. 1894)
- Dwyre v. Speer 27 S.W. 585, (Tex. App. 1894)
- Briggs v. Pierson 28 S.W. 467, (Tex. App. 1894)
- Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. Kinnebrew 27 S.W. 631, (Tex. App. 1894)
- Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Slayden 27 S.W. 424, (Tex. App. 1894)
- Daniels v. Creekmore 27 S.W. 148, (Tex. App. 1894)
- City National Bank v. Merchants National Bank 27 S.W. 848, (Tex. App. 1894)
- W. C. Moody & Co. v. D. O. McRimmon & Co. 27 S.W. 780, (Tex. App. 1894)
- Gibbs and Abercrombie v. Petree 27 S.W. 685, (Tex. App. 1894)
- Marshall v. Spillane 27 S.W. 162, (Tex. App. 1894)
- McNeil v. Moore 27 S.W. 163, (Tex. App. 1894)
- Crystal Ice Manufacturing Co. v. San Antonio Brewing Ass'n 27 S.W. 210, (Tex. App. 1894)
- Ratliff v. Burleson 25 S.W. 983, (Tex. App. 1894)
- Harrel v. Hide & Leather National Bank 26 S.W. 1011, (Tex. App. 1894)
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Reeves 27 S.W. 1925, (Tex. App. 1894)
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Scott 26 S.W. 998, (Tex. App. 1894)
- Finegan v. Read 27 S.W. 261, (Tex. App. 1894)
- Alamo Fire Insurance Co. v. Lancaster 28 S.W. 123, (Tex. App. 1894)
- Schmidt v. Huff 28 S.W. 1053, (Tex. App. 1894)
- City of Victoria v. Jessel 27 S.W. 159, (Tex. App. 1894)
- Bishop v. Lusk 27 S.W. 306, (Tex. App. 1894)
- Massey v. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. 27 S.W. 208, (Tex. App. 1894)
- Sanger v. Slayden 26 S.W. 847, (Tex. App. 1894)
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Chilton 27 S.W. 272, (Tex. App. 1894)
- Troutman v. McClesky 27 S.W. 173, (Tex. App. 1894)
- Steger v. Davis 27 S.W. 1068, (Tex. App. 1894)
- Penfield v. Harris 27 S.W. 726, (Tex. App. 1894)
- Brown v. Harris 27 S.W. 45, (Tex. App. 1894)
- Coles v. Thompson 27 S.W. 46, (Tex. App. 1894)
- French v. Groesbeck 27 S.W. 43, (Tex. App. 1894)
- Maverick v. Routh 23 S.W. 596, (Tex. App. 1894)
- Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Lewis 28 S.W. 101, (Tex. App. 1894)
- R. E. Stafford & Co. v. Leon & H. Blum 27 S.W. 12, (Tex. App. 1894)
- Kuykendall v. Coulter 26 S.W. 748, (Tex. App. 1894)
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Peay 26 S.W. 768, (Tex. App. 1894)
- San Antonio Street Railway Co. v. Muth 27 S.W. 752, (Tex. App. 1894)