Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /Texas /Cases /Texas Courts of Appeals /

1894

345 Court of Civil Appeals of Texas opinions from 1894.

  • Baldwin v. Goldfrank 26 S.W. 155, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Seiffer v. McLean & Eggers 26 S.W. 315, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Texas Elevator & Compress Co. v. Mitchell 28 S.W. 45, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • F.W. D.C. Ry. v. Peters 26 S.W. 78, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Ph&338nix Insurance Co. v. Ward 26 S.W. 763, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Henkel v. Bohnke 26 S.W. 645, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Wipff v. Heder 26 S.W. 118, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Sheldon v. Caples & Hammer 26 S.W. 330, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Newton v. A. Ganss & Co. 26 S.W. 81, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • MacDonnell v. De Los Fuentes 26 S.W. 972, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Produce Co. v. Turner, Administrator 26 S.W. 917, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Dallas Rapid Transit Railway Co. v. Elliott 26 S.W. 455, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Bayha v. Carter 26 S.W. 137, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Chrisman v. Wyatt 26 S.W. 759, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Marble Falls Ferry Co. v. Spitler 25 S.W. 985, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Baxter v. Howell 26 S.W. 453, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • City of Texarkana v. Talbot 26 S.W. 451, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Allen 26 S.W. 434, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Heidenheimer v. Loring 26 S.W. 99, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Furrh v. McKnight 26 S.W. 95, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Linberg v. Finks 25 S.W. 789, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • French v. Scheuber 26 S.W. 133, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Ruiz v. Campbell 26 S.W. 295, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Hill v. Smith 25 S.W. 1079, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Pease v. Bergen, Daniel & Gracy 25 S.W. 803, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Martin v. Western Union Telegraph Co. 26 S.W. 136, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Hanner v. Summerhill 26 S.W. 906, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Elwell v. Tatum 24 S.W. 71, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Cantrell v. Dyer 25 S.W. 1098, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Houston & Texas Central Railway Co. v. Strycharski 26 S.W. 253, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Mann v. Earnest 25 S.W. 1042, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Lyons 25 S.W. 805, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Putnam v. Capps & Canty 25 S.W. 1024, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Marberry & Son v. Farmers & Mechanics National Bank 26 S.W. 215, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Smelser v. Baker 26 S.W. 905, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Fry v. Houston 26 S.W. 284, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • City of Galveston v. Gonzales 25 S.W. 978, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Simons & McCarty 25 S.W. 996, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Tobar v. Losano 25 S.W. 973, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • St. Louis Type Foundry v. Taylor 26 S.W. 226, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Fletcher 26 S.W. 446, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Hayden 26 S.W. 331, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Williams v. Beckham 26 S.W. 652, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Fort Worth & Denver City Railway Co. v. Whitehead 26 S.W. 172, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Davis v. Pearson 26 S.W. 241, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Adams v. Dignowity 28 S.W. 373, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Hull v. Davidson 25 S.W. 1047, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Stephenson v. Stephenson 25 S.W. 649, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Pruett v. Western Union Telegraph Co. 25 S.W. 794, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • First National Bank v. Lynch 25 S.W. 1042, (Tex. App. 1894)
« Prev 1 … 3 4 5 6 7 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑