Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /Texas /Cases /Texas Courts of Appeals /

1913

1201 Court of Civil Appeals of Texas opinions from 1913.

  • Powell v. Stephens 163 S.W. 672, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Lane v. Chappell 159 S.W. 905, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Tompkins v. Pendleton 160 S.W. 290, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Lane v. Higgins 159 S.W. 907, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Marschall v. Smith 158 S.W. 1047, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Stirling v. Bettis Mfg. Co. 159 S.W. 915, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Chaison v. McFaddin 159 S.W. 69, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Fred A. Jones Co. v. Drake 159 S.W. 441, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Bowles v. Belt 159 S.W. 885, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Goodwin v. Western Union Telegraph Co. 160 S.W. 107, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Tandy v. Astle 159 S.W. 468, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Herron-Robbins v. Allen 159 S.W. 1046, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Roberts v. Prather 158 S.W. 789, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • City of Dallas v. Dallas Consol. Electric St. Ry. Co. 159 S.W. 76, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Porter v. Brooks 159 S.W. 192, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Hanks v. Leslie 159 S.W. 1056, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Douthitt v. Farrar 159 S.W. 182, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Henderson v. Wilkinson 159 S.W. 1045, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Putnam Land & Development Co. v. Elser 159 S.W. 190, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Newman v. Tarwater 159 S.W. 495, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Webb v. Harding 159 S.W. 1029, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Irving v. Texas & P. Ry. Co. 164 S.W. 910, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Co-Operative Vineyards Co. v. Ft. Stockton Irrigated Lands Co. 158 S.W. 1191, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Dallas County v. Bolton 158 S.W. 1152, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Sanches v. Newman 158 S.W. 797, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of Texas v. Cole 159 S.W. 146, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Chambers v. Rawls 158 S.W. 208, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Wauhop v. Sauvage's Heirs 159 S.W. 185, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • McCall Co. v. Elliott 159 S.W. 872, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Bee Candy Mfg. Co. v. Maibaum 158 S.W. 575, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Houston T. C. R. Co. v. Ellis 160 S.W. 606, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • San Antonio & A. P. Ry. Co. v. Williams 158 S.W. 1171, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • San Antonio Traction Co. v. Badgett 158 S.W. 803, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Trinity & Brazos Valley Ry. Co. v. Lunsford 160 S.W. 677, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Patrucio v. Selkirk 160 S.W. 635, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. West Bros. 159 S.W. 142, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • F. A. Piper Co. v. Oppenheimer 158 S.W. 777, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Blum v. Kusenberger 158 S.W. 779, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Waugh v. Hudson 159 S.W. 893, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Scurlock v. Fairchilds 159 S.W. 1000, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Young v. Bundy 158 S.W. 566, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Porter v. Memphis Land & Commission Co. 159 S.W. 497, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Stewart v. Blain 159 S.W. 928, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Baker v. McDonald 159 S.W. 450, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Kelly v. Dallas Consol. Electric St. Ry. Co. 158 S.W. 221, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • McCord v. Southwestern Sundries Co. 158 S.W. 226, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Lane v. Mayfield 158 S.W. 223, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Vickery 158 S.W. 792, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Pecos & N. T. Ry. Co. v. Porter 158 S.W. 564, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Ph&338nix Land Co. v. Exall 159 S.W. 474, (Tex. App. 1913)
« Prev 1 … 8 9 10 11 12 … 25 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑