Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /United States /Cases /U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit /

1922

123 U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit opinions from 1922.

  • Kountze v. Blochman 284 F. 962, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Dean v. City of San Diego 284 F. 970, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • United States v. Great Northern Ry. Co. 285 F. 152, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Fassolla v. United States 285 F. 378, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • First Nat. Bank v. McKean 285 F. 557, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Panzich v. United States 285 F. 871, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Bank of Anchorage v. Conroy 284 F. 929, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • City of Seattle v. Puget Sound Power & Light Co. 284 F. 659, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • New York Life Ins. v. Slocomb 284 F. 810, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Eilers Music House v. Sitton 284 F. 815, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Fries v. United States 284 F. 825, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • United States v. Payne 284 F. 827, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Rousseau v. Weedin 284 F. 565, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Pera v. White 284 F. 699, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Christie v. Great Northern Ry. Co. 284 F. 702, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • New York Life Ins. v. Rutherford 284 F. 707, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Pacific S. S. Co. v. Washington 284 F. 712, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Kier v. Burch 284 F. 714, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Raffour v. United States 284 F. 720, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Climenson v. Carson, Pirie, Scott & Co. 284 F. 507, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • A. O. Andersen & Co. v. United States 284 F. 542, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Mono Power Co. v. City of Los Angeles 284 F. 784, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • White v. Stump 284 F. 199, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Everett v. United States 284 F. 203, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Jackson v. Sunlet Fruit Co. 283 F. 767, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Bacon v. Neill 283 F. 717, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Wong Wong v. Honolulu Skating Rink, Ltd. 283 F. 731, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Nehalem S. S. Co. v. Aktieselskabet Aggi 284 F. 56, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • American Asiatic Co. v. Robert Dollar Co. 282 F. 743, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • King County v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp. 282 F. 950, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Davis v. American Silk Spinning Co. 282 F. 954, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Town of Fairbanks v. Barrack 282 F. 417, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Millich v. United States 282 F. 604, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Sekinoff v. United States 283 F. 38, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • T. C. Chou v. White 282 F. 227, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Oakland Water Front Co. v. Le Roy 282 F. 385, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Lambert v. United States 282 F. 413, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Donlan v. Turner, Dennis & Lowry Lumber Co. 282 F. 421, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Violette v. Walsh 282 F. 582, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Lowe v. United States 282 F. 597, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Ephraim v. Nevada & California Land & Live Stock Co. 282 F. 610, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • White v. Chung Him 282 F. 612, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Pool v. Walsh 282 F. 620, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Olson v. Campbell 283 F. 11, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Pacific Towboat Co. v. Dominion Mill Co. 283 F. 15, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Vachina v. United States 283 F. 35, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Bachenberg v. United States 283 F. 37, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Idaho Irr. Co. v. Gooding 285 F. 453, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • United States v. King County 281 F. 686, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • United States v. Matthews 282 F. 266, (9th Cir. 1922)
« Prev 1 2 3 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑