Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /United States /Cases /U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit /

1922

126 U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit opinions from 1922.

  • United States v. Matthews 282 F. 266, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Arenz v. Astoria Sav. Bank 281 F. 530, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Hopkins v. Bronaugh 281 F. 799, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • McGrew v. United States 281 F. 809, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Elliott v. American Surety Co. of New York 281 F. 829, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • O'Donnell v. Powell 282 F. 1, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Crowley Launch & Tugboat Co. v. United States Shipping Bord Emergency Fleet Corp. 282 F. 17, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Walton N. Moore Dry Goods Co. v. Commercial Industrial Co. 282 F. 21, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Kier v. Steer 282 F. 202, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Selectasine Patents Co. v. Prest-O-Graph Co. 282 F. 223, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Central California Canneries Co. v. Dunkley Co. 282 F. 406, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Davis v. Parrington 281 F. 10, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Strada v. United States 281 F. 143, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Driskill v. United States 281 F. 146, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • United States v. Bellingham Bay Improvement Co. 281 F. 522, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Iponmatsu Ukichi v. United States 281 F. 525, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Castle v. Castle 281 F. 609, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Boise-Payette Lumber Co. v. Halloran-Judge Trust Co. 281 F. 818, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Rubaiz v. Tucson Gas, Electric Light & Power Co. 280 F. 267, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Craine v. Oliver Chilled Plow Works 280 F. 954, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Stennick v. Jones 282 F. 161, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Greime v. Freeman 282 F. 261, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Woolwine Metal Products Co. v. Boyle 279 F. 609, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Richfield Oil Co. v. Western Machinery Co. 279 F. 852, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Alaska Juneau Gold Mining Co. v. Larson 279 F. 420, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Sterling Tire Corp. v. Sullivan 279 F. 336, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Harris v. Moreland Motor Truck Co. 279 F. 543, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Fleming v. United States 279 F. 613, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Niday v. Graef 279 F. 941, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Soininen v. United States 279 F. 419, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • American Can Co. v. Garnett 279 F. 722, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • American Can Co. v. Funkhouser 279 F. 727, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Feigin v. United States 279 F. 107, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Douglas Fir Exploitation & Export Co. v. Comyn 279 F. 203, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • United States v. California Midway Oil Co. 279 F. 516, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Kaneda v. United States 278 F. 694, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Gong Sic Or v. White 278 F. 733, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Gerber v. Spencer 278 F. 886, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Brolaski v. United States 279 F. 1, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • United Verde Extension Mining Co. v. Littlejohn 279 F. 223, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • McCurry v. United States 281 F. 532, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Ross-Higgins Co. v. Protzman 278 F. 699, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Alaska Packers' Ass'n v. Gover 278 F. 927, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Wood v. Noyes 279 F. 321, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Willis v. United States 278 F. 611, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • White v. Young Yen 278 F. 619, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Norsk Hydro-Elektrisk Kvaelstof Actieselskab v. California & O. S. S. Co. 278 F. 689, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Northport Smelting & Refining Co. v. Lone Pine-Surprise Consol. Mines Co. 278 F. 719, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Ozmo Oil Refining Co. v. Cotton & Co. 278 F. 722, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Hind v. Western Union Telegraph Co. 278 F. 730, (9th Cir. 1922)
« Prev 1 2 3 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑