Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /United States /Cases /U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit /

1899

90 U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit opinions from 1899.

  • Foster v. Antisdel May 2, 1899 No. 123 14 App. D.C. 552; 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3582
  • Spitzer v. Friedlander May 2, 1899 No. 857 14 App. D.C. 556; 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3583
  • Bradshaw v. Ashley Apr 13, 1899 No. 769 14 App. D.C. 485; 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3580
  • District of Columbia v. Robinson Apr 11, 1899 No. 820 14 App. D.C. 512; 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3581
  • Kenaday v. Sinnott Apr 5, 1899 Nos. 888 and 890 14 App. D.C. 484; 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3579
  • Bechman v. Wood Apr 4, 1899 No. 120 15 App. D.C. 484; 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3533
  • Burton v. Bentley Apr 4, 1899 No. 128 14 App. D.C. 471; 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3576
  • Chapman v. Dismer Apr 4, 1899 No. 870 14 App. D.C. 446; 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3573
  • Davis v. Harper Apr 4, 1899 No. 865 14 App. D.C. 463; 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3575
  • Fowler v. Dodge Apr 4, 1899 No. 124 14 App. D.C. 477; 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3578
  • Holtzman v. United States Apr 4, 1899 Nos. 873, 874 and 875 14 App. D.C. 454; 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3574
  • In re Lowry's Appeal Apr 4, 1899 No. 118 14 App. D.C. 473; 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3577
  • Price v. United States Apr 4, 1899 No. 866 14 App. D.C. 391; 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3569
  • Lasley v. District of Columbia Mar 24, 1899 No. 861 14 App. D.C. 407; 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3570
  • United States ex rel. Hufty v. Trimble Mar 24, 1899 No. 867 14 App. D.C. 414; 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3571
  • Chamberlain v. Browning Mar 14, 1899 No. 882 14 App. D.C. 389; 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3568
  • Guarantee Savings, Loan & Investment Co. v. Pendleton Mar 9, 1899 No. 64 14 App. D.C. 384; 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3567
  • In re Bedford's Appeal Mar 8, 1899 No. 121 14 App. D.C. 376; 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3566
  • Chandler & Taylor Co. v. Norwood Feb 28, 1899 No. 869 14 App. D.C. 357; 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3564
  • Eastern Trust & Banking Co. v. American Ice Co. Feb 28, 1899 Nos. 800 and 801 14 App. D.C. 304; 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3562
  • Davis v. Harper Feb 23, 1899 No. 865 14 App. D.C. 298; 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3561
  • Chesapeake & Ohio Railroad v. Howard Feb 21, 1899 No. 845 14 App. D.C. 262; 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3560
  • Bader v. Vajen Feb 9, 1899 No. 111 14 App. D.C. 241; 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3558
  • Cross v. Phillips Feb 8, 1899 No. 112 14 App. D.C. 228; 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3557
  • In re Marsden's Appeal Feb 8, 1899 No. 103 14 App. D.C. 223; 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3556
  • Zeust v. Staffan Feb 8, 1899 Nos. 825 and 827 14 App. D.C. 200; 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3555
  • Emack v. Campbell Feb 7, 1899 No. 835 14 App. D.C. 186; 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3554
  • In re Smith's Appeal Feb 7, 1899 No. 113 14 App. D.C. 181; 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3553
  • Williams v. Ogle Jan 17, 1899 No. 100 14 App. D.C. 145; 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3551
  • Tracy v. Leslie Jan 10, 1899 No. 107 14 App. D.C. 126; 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3549
  • Winslow v. Austin Jan 10, 1899 No. 102 14 App. D.C. 137; 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3550
  • District of Columbia v. Camden Iron Works Jan 9, 1899 No. 894 15 App. D.C. 198; 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3507
  • Albaugh v. Litho-Marble Decorating Co. Jan 3, 1899 Nos. 846 and 847 14 App. D.C. 113; 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3548
  • Anderson v. Reid Jan 3, 1899 No. 859 14 App. D.C. 54; 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3546
  • Cain v. Park Jan 3, 1899 No. 105 14 App. D.C. 42; 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3544
  • Esty v. Newton Jan 3, 1899 No. 110 14 App. D.C. 50; 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3545
  • Keane v. Chamberlain Jan 3, 1899 No. 860 14 App. D.C. 84; 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3547
  • Pechstein v. Smith Jan 3, 1899 No. 849 14 App. D.C. 27; 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3542
  • Sinnott v. Kenaday Jan 3, 1899 No. 855 14 App. D.C. 1; 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3541
  • Traver v. Brown Jan 3, 1899 No. 101 14 App. D.C. 34; 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3543
« Prev 1 2 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑