Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /United States /Cases /U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit /

1912

185 U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit opinions from 1912.

  • American Security & Trust Co. v. Kaveney 39 App. D.C. 223, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Rudolph v. Golden & Co. 39 App. D.C. 230, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Philip Carey Co. v. Thyson 39 App. D.C. 233, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Wren v. Goodman 39 App. D.C. 240, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Wade v. Fisher 39 App. D.C. 245, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Green v. McIntire 39 App. D.C. 249, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Noble v. Crane 39 App. D.C. 252, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Nicolopole v. Love 39 App. D.C. 342, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Ganss v. Goldenberg 39 App. D.C. 597, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Hopper v. Supplee Hardware Co. 39 App. D.C. 596, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Chesapeake Beach Railway Co. v. Brez 39 App. D.C. 58, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Patterson v. United States 39 App. D.C. 84, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Armstrong v. Pennebaker 39 App. D.C. 92, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Prall v. Prall 39 App. D.C. 100, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • United States ex rel. District of Columbia v. Bayly 39 App. D.C. 105, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Deitsch Bros. v. Loonen 39 App. D.C. 114, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • In re Independent Breweries Co. 39 App. D.C. 118, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Williams v. Barnes 39 App. D.C. 120, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Lederer v. Walker 39 App. D.C. 122, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Slick v. Hansen 39 App. D.C. 131, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Bolin v. Slingluff 39 App. D.C. 134, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Putnam v. Wetmore 39 App. D.C. 138, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Re Maas 39 App. D.C. 142, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Hopkins v. Cleal 39 App. D.C. 144, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Western Electric Co. v. Martin 39 App. D.C. 147, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Levering Coffee Co. v. Merchants Coffee Co. 39 App. D.C. 151, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Re Hodkinson 39 App. D.C. 155, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Baker v. District of Columbia 39 App. D.C. 42, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • United States ex rel. Scott v. Moore 39 App. D.C. 36, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Rudolph v. Creamer 39 App. D.C. 1, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • United States ex rel. McKenzie v. Fisher 39 App. D.C. 7, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Waters v. Pearson 39 App. D.C. 10, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Waters v. McKahan 39 App. D.C. 18, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Madre v. Gaskins 39 App. D.C. 19, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Dahlgren v. Story 39 App. D.C. 29, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Hewitt v. Weintraub 38 App. D.C. 548, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Wagner v. White 38 App. D.C. 554, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • District of Columbia v. Jones 38 App. D.C. 560, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Kidwell v. United States 38 App. D.C. 566, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Howard v. Howard 38 App. D.C. 575, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Murphy 38 App. D.C. 582, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Dixon v. Great Falls & Old Dominion Railway Co. 38 App. D.C. 591, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Rowlett v. Nash 38 App. D.C. 598, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Dixon v. Great Falls & Old Dominion Railway Co. 38 App. D.C. 598, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • In re Rudolph 38 App. D.C. 547, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Stewart v. Strider 38 App. D.C. 459, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • McKee v. District National Bank 38 App. D.C. 465, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • United States v. Capital Traction Co. 38 App. D.C. 469, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • United States ex rel. Foreman v. Meyer 38 App. D.C. 472, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Fowler v. Fowler 38 App. D.C. 476, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
« Prev 1 2 3 4 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑