1912
185 U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit opinions from 1912.
- Collis v. Quenzer 38 App. D.C. 481, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
- Jackson Corset Co. v. Cohen 38 App. D.C. 482, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
- Courson v. O'Connor 38 App. D.C. 484, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
- Baetz v. Kukkuck 38 App. D.C. 489, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
- Le Brou v. Nix 38 App. D.C. 494, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
- In re Mattullath 38 App. D.C. 497, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
- Bradley v. Miggett 38 App. D.C. 516, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
- In re Welsbach 38 App. D.C. 518, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
- In re Meyer Bros. Coffee & Spice Co. 38 App. D.C. 520, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
- Poffenbarger v. Olson 38 App. D.C. 522, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
- In re Wenzelmann 38 App. D.C. 528, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
- Sears & Nichols Co. v. Brakeley 38 App. D.C. 530, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
- C. A. Gambrill Manufacturing Co. v. Waggoner-Gates Milling Co. 38 App. D.C. 532, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
- H. Becker & Co. v. C. A. Gambrill Manufacturing Co. 38 App. D.C. 535, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
- Summers v. Clark 38 App. D.C. 537, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
- In re Gold 38 App. D.C. 544, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
- Nuckols v. Nuckols 38 App. D.C. 441, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
- Green v. Gordon 38 App. D.C. 443, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
- Woodward v. States 38 App. D.C. 323, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
- Huff v. Gulick 38 App. D.C. 334, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
- Kruh v. Thomas 38 App. D.C. 337, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
- Evans v. Marsh 38 App. D.C. 341, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
- Johnson v. States 38 App. D.C. 347, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
- Miller v. United States 38 App. D.C. 361, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
- Sacrini v. United States 38 App. D.C. 371, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
- United States ex rel. Kreh v. Ingham 38 App. D.C. 379, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
- Metzger v. Markham 38 App. D.C. 383, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
- Parsons v. District of Columbia 38 App. D.C. 388, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
- Jordan v. American Security & Trust Co. 38 App. D.C. 391, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
- Willey v. Stormont 38 App. D.C. 399, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
- Farr v. Valentine 38 App. D.C. 413, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
- Washington Home for Incurables v. American Security & Trust Co. 38 App. D.C. 421, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
- Vermillion v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad 38 App. D.C. 434, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
- Sullivan v. Goldman 38 App. D.C. 319, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Duke 38 App. D.C. 164, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
- Rice v. Schutte 38 App. D.C. 175, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
- District of Columbia v. Dean 38 App. D.C. 182, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
- La Normandie Hotel Co. v. Security Trust Co. 38 App. D.C. 187, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
- Philadelphia, Baltimore, & Washington Railroad v. Karr 38 App. D.C. 193, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
- Friedlander v. Rapley 38 App. D.C. 208, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
- Fowler v. Quigley 38 App. D.C. 214, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
- Sprow v. Staples 38 App. D.C. 219, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
- Craighead v. Alexander 38 App. D.C. 229, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
- Toledo Computing Scale Co. v. Miller 38 App. D.C. 237, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
- Simmons v. Jaselli 38 App. D.C. 242, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
- O'Hanlon v. Grubb 38 App. D.C. 251, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
- District of Columbia v. Donaldson 38 App. D.C. 259, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
- Roller v. Clark 38 App. D.C. 260, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
- Washington Railway & Electric Co. v. Wright 38 App. D.C. 268, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
- Brewer v. Whitney 38 App. D.C. 273, (D.C. Cir. 1912)