Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /United States /Cases /U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit /

1922

138 U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit opinions from 1922.

  • Dowell v. Doman Apr 3, 1922 No. 1470 279 F. 1013; 51 App. D.C. 375; 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 1660
  • Globe Furniture Co. v. Gately Apr 3, 1922 No. 3632 279 F. 1005; 51 App. D.C. 367; 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 1657
  • Harris v. N. L. Sansbury Co. Apr 3, 1922 No. 3627 279 F. 1015; 51 App. D.C. 377; 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 1661
  • Hieston v. National City Bank of Chicago Apr 3, 1922 No. 3609 280 F. 525; 51 App. D.C. 394
  • In re Nathan Apr 3, 1922 No. 1414 279 F. 925; 51 App. D.C. 347; 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 1639
  • Indiana Flooring Co. v. District Nat. Bank of Washington Apr 3, 1922 No. 3672 280 F. 522; 51 App. D.C. 391; 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 1824
  • Lindau v. Smulski Apr 3, 1922 No. 1480 280 F. 463; 51 App. D.C. 389; 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 1811
  • Maryland Casualty Co. v. John H. Parker Co. Apr 3, 1922 No. 3652 279 F. 796; 51 App. D.C. 340; 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 1621
  • McCoy v. Duehay Apr 3, 1922 No. 3678 279 F. 1001; 51 App. D.C. 363; 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 1656
  • McGrew v. McGrew Apr 3, 1922 No. 3664 279 F. 923; 51 App. D.C. 345; 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 1638
  • Mooers v. Shoemaker Apr 3, 1922 No. 3514 279 F. 1008; 51 App. D.C. 370; 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 1658
  • Phillips v. Moore & Hill, Inc. Apr 3, 1922 No. 3670 279 F. 927; 51 App. D.C. 349; 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 1640
  • Rice Auto Co. v. Spillman Apr 3, 1922 No. 3605 280 F. 452; 51 App. D.C. 378; 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 1806
  • Rust v. Young Apr 3, 1922 Nos. 3698-3700 279 F. 989; 51 App. D.C. 351; 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 1652
  • Sherman v. Hagemann Apr 3, 1922 No. 1482 279 F. 1011; 51 App. D.C. 373; 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 1659
  • Stein v. Dosch Apr 3, 1922 No. 1487 279 F. 799; 51 App. D.C. 343; 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 1622
  • Widmer v. Sipp Apr 3, 1922 No. 1481 280 F. 460; 51 App. D.C. 386; 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 1810
  • Arnold v. Thompson & Spear Co. Mar 6, 1922 No. 3493 279 F. 307; 51 App. D.C. 325; 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 1538
  • Convery v. Brucker Mar 6, 1922 No. 1430 278 F. 1019; 51 App. D.C. 306; 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 2762
  • Denby v. Berry Mar 6, 1922 No. 3541 279 F. 317; 51 App. D.C. 335; 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 1542
  • Dreslin v. Phillips Mar 6, 1922 No. 3510 279 F. 303; 51 App. D.C. 324; 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 1536
  • Eldred v. Fink Mar 6, 1922 Nos. 1474, 1475 279 F. 190; 51 App. D.C. 321; 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 1515
  • Equitable Surety Co. v. National Capital Bank of Washington Mar 6, 1922 No. 3513 278 F. 1002; 51 App. D.C. 289; 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 2756
  • Evans v. Neumann Mar 6, 1922 No. 3646 278 F. 1013; 51 App. D.C. 300; 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 2759
  • Gray v. McAfee Mar 6, 1922 No. 1461 279 F. 176; 51 App. D.C. 307; 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 1511
  • Harris v. District of Columbia Mar 6, 1922 No. 2817 278 F. 1020; 51 App. D.C. 401; 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 2763
  • In re Shollenberger Mar 6, 1922 No. 1463 279 F. 314; 51 App. D.C. 332; 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 1540
  • Jones v. District of Columbia Mar 6, 1922 No. 3559 279 F. 188; 51 App. D.C. 319; 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 1514
  • Kennedy v. Mangan Mar 6, 1922 No. 3657 278 F. 1009; 51 App. D.C. 296; 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 2758
  • Louis v. Washington Ry. & Electric Co. Mar 6, 1922 No. 3487 279 F. 312; 51 App. D.C. 330; 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 1539
  • Molloy v. Kellogg Mar 6, 1922 No. 3507 278 F. 1015; 51 App. D.C. 302; 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 2760
  • Moncure v. Moncure Mar 6, 1922 No. 3637 278 F. 1005; 51 App. D.C. 292; 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 2757
  • Moore v. Moore Mar 6, 1922 No. 3607 278 F. 1017; 51 App. D.C. 304; 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 2761
  • Robertson v. Washington Ry. & Electric Co. Mar 6, 1922 No. 3659 279 F. 180; 51 App. D.C. 311; 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 1512
  • Security Savings & Commercial Bank v. District of Columbia Mar 6, 1922 No. 3608 279 F. 185; 51 App. D.C. 316; 4 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 4352; 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 1513
  • United States ex rel. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission Mar 6, 1922 No. 3713 279 F. 316; 51 App. D.C. 334; 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 1541
  • Chalman v. De Voe Feb 6, 1922 No. 1462 278 F. 585; 51 App. D.C. 276; 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 2751
  • Clement v. McQuarrie Feb 6, 1922 No. 1464 278 F. 587; 51 App. D.C. 278; 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 2752
  • Dosenbach v. Webster Feb 6, 1922 No. 1477 278 F. 395; 51 App. D.C. 254; 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 2745
  • Dosenbach v. Webster Feb 6, 1922 No. 1478 278 F. 397; 51 App. D.C. 256; 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 2746
  • E. McIlhenny's Son v. B. F. Trappey Feb 6, 1922 Nos. 1468, 1469 278 F. 582; 51 App. D.C. 273; 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 2750
  • Hayden v. Filippone Feb 6, 1922 No. 3509 278 F. 329; 51 App. D.C. 246; 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 2739
  • In re Dunbar Feb 6, 1922 No. 1399 278 F. 334; 51 App. D.C. 251; 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 2742
  • In re Haskell Feb 6, 1922 Nos. 1471, 1472 278 F. 326; 51 App. D.C. 243; 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 2738
  • In re Keller Feb 6, 1922 No. 1467 278 F. 395; 51 App. D.C. 254; 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 2744
  • In re Kusterer Feb 6, 1922 No. 1400 278 F. 333; 51 App. D.C. 250; 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 2741
  • In re Mummert Feb 6, 1922 No. 1473 278 F. 399; 51 App. D.C. 258; 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 2747
  • In re Prescott Feb 6, 1922 No. 1460 278 F. 590; 51 App. D.C. 281; 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 2753
  • Ironsides Co. v. Citizens' Wholesale Supply Co. Feb 6, 1922 No. 1465 278 F. 336; 51 App. D.C. 253; 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 2743
  • Janes v. Janes Feb 6, 1922 No. 3508 278 F. 576; 51 App. D.C. 267; 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 2748
« Prev 1 2 3 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑