Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /United States /Cases /U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit /

2009

1293 U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit opinions from 2009.

  • Johnson v. United States (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Goldman v. United States (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Bassing v. United States 563 F.3d 1280, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Trobovic v. General Services Administration 328 F. App'x 643, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Hastie v. United States (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Hyde v. United States 332 F. App'x 611, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Hyde v. United States 332 F. App'x 611, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Eady v. Shinseki 321 F. App'x 971, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Trobovic v. General Services Admin. (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. v. Doll 561 F.3d 1372, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Felix v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. 562 F.3d 1167, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • In Re Siemens Water Technologies (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Comcast Cable Communicatiosn v. Finisar Corp. (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Blanton v. Merit Systems Protection Board (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Palmyra Pacific Seafoods, L.L.C. v. United States 561 F.3d 1361, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Transcore v. Electronic Transaction Consultants Corp. 563 F.3d 1271, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Cooley v. Dept. Of Homeland Security (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • In Re Telular Corp. 319 F. App'x 909, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • In Re U.S. (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • American Airlines, Inc. v. United States 551 F.3d 1294, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Hubbard v. Merit Systems Protection Board 319 F. App'x 912, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Jack v. Department of Veterans Affairs 321 F. App'x 967, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Schultz v. United States Postal Service 323 F. App'x 912, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • American Airlines, Inc. v. United States 551 F.3d 1294, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Eli Lilly and Co. 560 F.3d 1366, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • In Re Tan (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • In Re Hickman (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Delaney v. Dept. Of Transportation (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Heeling Sports Ltd. v. U.S. Furong International, Inc. 319 F. App'x 905, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • In Re Kubin 561 F.3d 1351, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Rosado v. Dept. Of the Air Force (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Coradeschi v. Department of Homeland Security 326 F. App'x 566, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Coradeschi v. Department of Homeland Security 326 F. App'x 566, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Jemmott v. Shinseki 331 F. App'x 741, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Jemmott v. Shinseki 331 F. App'x 741, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • In re Wilder 345 F. App'x 549, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • In re Wilder 345 F. App'x 549, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Black v. Ce Soir Lingerie Co., Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • In Re Byerly (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Crater Corp. v. Lucent Technologies, Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Vores v. Merit Systems Protection Board 324 F. App'x 883, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Morrissey v. Department of the Treasury 319 F. App'x 902, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Goodloe v. United States Postal Service 324 F. App'x 878, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Tate v. Merit Systems Protection Board 324 F. App'x 881, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Benn v. Merit Systems Protection Board 322 F. App'x 986, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Esposo v. Office of Personnel Management 321 F. App'x 961, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Briggs v. Merit Systems Protection Board 322 F. App'x 983, (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Smart v. Merit Systems Protection Board (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Armachuelo v. Merit Systems Protection Board (Fed. Cir. 2009)
  • Hooks v. Merit Systems Protection Board (Fed. Cir. 2009)
« Prev 1 … 18 19 20 21 22 … 26 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑