1909
669 Supreme Court of Alabama opinions from 1909.
- Birmingham Belt R. R. v. Norris 50 So. 91, (Ala. 1909)
- Atlantic Coast Line R. R. v. Dothan Mule Co. 49 So. 882, (Ala. 1909)
- Atlanta & B. A. L. Ry. v. Alexander 49 So. 792, (Ala. 1909)
- Gray Eagle Coal Co. v. Lewis 49 So. 859, (Ala. 1909)
- Tennessee C. I. & R. R. v. George 49 So. 681, (Ala. 1909)
- Pike v. Tallassee Falls Manufacturing Co. 49 So. 857, (Ala. 1909)
- Alteriac v. West Pratt Coal Co. 49 So. 867, (Ala. 1909)
- Birmingham R. L. & P. Co. v. Pritchett 49 So. 782, (Ala. 1909)
- Central of Ga. Ry. Co. v. Morgan 49 So. 865, (Ala. 1909)
- Henderson Law Co. v. Wilson 49 So. 845, (Ala. 1909)
- Aston v. Dodson 49 So. 856, (Ala. 1909)
- Hooper v. J. H. & W. B. Bankhead 49 So. 858, (Ala. 1909)
- Wood Mercantile Co. v. McAdoo 49 So. 856, (Ala. 1909)
- Ellis & Co. v. Brannon 49 So. 1034, (Ala. 1909)
- Johnson v. Miller 49 So. 858, (Ala. 1909)
- Clarke v. Dunn 50 So. 93, (Ala. 1909)
- Allen v. State 50 So. 279, (Ala. 1909)
- Cefalu v. Dearborn & Warfield 49 So. 1030, (Ala. 1909)
- Prince v. Prince 49 So. 873, (Ala. 1909)
- Ham v. State ex rel. Blackmon 49 So. 1032, (Ala. 1909)
- Houston v. Davis 49 So. 869, (Ala. 1909)
- Costello v. Feagin 50 So. 134, (Ala. 1909)
- Wright v. Sample 50 So. 268, (Ala. 1909)
- Weinstein v. Yielding Bros. & Co. 50 So. 123, (Ala. 1909)
- Marx v. Kilby Locomotive & Machine Works 50 So. 136, (Ala. 1909)
- Pollack v. Gunter & Gunter 50 So. 155, (Ala. 1909)
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Art Metal Construction Co. 50 So. 186, (Ala. 1909)
- W. T. Adams Machine Co. v. Turner 50 So. 308, (Ala. 1909)
- Reese v. Ivey 50 So. 223, (Ala. 1909)
- Southern Ry. Co. v. Hartshorne 50 So. 139, (Ala. 1909)
- Houston v. Howze 50 So. 266, (Ala. 1909)
- Turner v. Louisville & Nashville R. R. 50 So. 124, (Ala. 1909)
- Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. Johnson 50 So. 300, (Ala. 1909)
- Howard v. State 49 So. 755, (Ala. 1909)
- Caldwell v. State 49 So. 679, (Ala. 1909)
- McMillan v. State 49 So. 680, (Ala. 1909)
- Bailey v. State 49 So. 754, (Ala. 1909)
- Board of Revenue of Jefferson v. Birmingham Waterworks Co. 49 So. 683, (Ala. 1909)
- Ryan v. City of Birmingham 49 So. 749, (Ala. 1909)
- Sherrer v. Enterprise Banking Co. 49 So. 779, (Ala. 1909)
- Johnson v. Scoggins 49 So. 785, (Ala. 1909)
- Roach v. Cox 49 So. 578, (Ala. 1909)
- City of Graymont v. Stott 49 So. 683, (Ala. 1909)
- Bufford v. City of Birmingham 49 So. 751, (Ala. 1909)
- Davenport v. City of Birmingham 49 So. 751, (Ala. 1909)
- Fowler v. State 49 So. 788, (Ala. 1909)
- Gaston v. State 49 So. 876, (Ala. 1909)
- Mosely v. State 49 So. 807, (Ala. 1909)
- Piano v. State 49 So. 803, (Ala. 1909)
- Sheffield Co. v. Morton 49 So. 772, (Ala. 1909)