Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /Alabama /Cases /Supreme Court of Alabama /

1909

740 Supreme Court of Alabama opinions from 1909.

  • Bailey v. State 49 So. 886, (Ala. 1909)
  • Feore v. Mississippi Transportation Co. 49 So. 871, (Ala. 1909)
  • Burton v. Phillips 49 So. 848, (Ala. 1909)
  • Smythe Lumber Co. v. Austin 49 So. 875, (Ala. 1909)
  • King v. Gilreath 49 So. 860, (Ala. 1909)
  • State ex rel. Scholl v. Duncan 50 So. 265, (Ala. 1909)
  • State ex rel. Garber v. Cazalas 50 So. 296, (Ala. 1909)
  • Sewell v. Buyck 50 So. 127, (Ala. 1909)
  • Crosswhite v. Commissioners Court 49 So. 870, (Ala. 1909)
  • McCreary v. Brown 50 So. 402, (Ala. 1909)
  • Southern Railway Co. v. Carter 51 So. 147, (Ala. 1909)
  • Southern Railway Co. v. Penney 51 So. 392, (Ala. 1909)
  • Noel v. State 49 So. 824, (Ala. 1909)
  • Dorgan & Young Hdw. Co. v. Stephens 49 So. 871, (Ala. 1909)
  • Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. Smith 50 So. 241, (Ala. 1909)
  • Hobbs v. Thompson 49 So. 787, (Ala. 1909)
  • Pearson v. Alverson 49 So. 756, (Ala. 1909)
  • Hill v. Gray 49 So. 676, (Ala. 1909)
  • Hoven v. Gewin 49 So. 676, (Ala. 1909)
  • Cable Co. v. Griffitts 49 So. 577, (Ala. 1909)
  • Swanson v. Brown 49 So. 675, (Ala. 1909)
  • Merchants Bank v. Acme Lumber & Mfg. Co. 49 So. 782, (Ala. 1909)
  • Bluitt v. State 49 So. 854, (Ala. 1909)
  • Monteith v. State 49 So. 777, (Ala. 1909)
  • Phillips v. State 49 So. 794, (Ala. 1909)
  • Peinhardt v. State 49 So. 831, (Ala. 1909)
  • Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. McMillion 49 So. 880, (Ala. 1909)
  • Bynum v. Gay 49 So. 757, (Ala. 1909)
  • Southern Railway Co. v. Dickens 49 So. 766, (Ala. 1909)
  • Lipscomb v. City of Bessemer 49 So. 872, (Ala. 1909)
  • Decatur Water Works Co. v. Foster 49 So. 759, (Ala. 1909)
  • Ferdon v. Dickens 49 So. 888, (Ala. 1909)
  • Jacobs v. Roach 49 So. 576, (Ala. 1909)
  • Baker v. Allen 49 So. 847, (Ala. 1909)
  • Birmingham Belt R. R. v. Norris 50 So. 91, (Ala. 1909)
  • Atlantic Coast Line R. R. v. Dothan Mule Co. 49 So. 882, (Ala. 1909)
  • Atlanta & B. A. L. Ry. v. Alexander 49 So. 792, (Ala. 1909)
  • Gray Eagle Coal Co. v. Lewis 49 So. 859, (Ala. 1909)
  • Tennessee C. I. & R. R. v. George 49 So. 681, (Ala. 1909)
  • Pike v. Tallassee Falls Manufacturing Co. 49 So. 857, (Ala. 1909)
  • Long v. City of Birmingham 49 So. 881, (Ala. 1909)
  • Alteriac v. West Pratt Coal Co. 49 So. 867, (Ala. 1909)
  • Birmingham R. L. & P. Co. v. Pritchett 49 So. 782, (Ala. 1909)
  • Central of Ga. Ry. Co. v. Morgan 49 So. 865, (Ala. 1909)
  • Henderson Law Co. v. Wilson 49 So. 845, (Ala. 1909)
  • Aston v. Dodson 49 So. 856, (Ala. 1909)
  • Hooper v. J. H. & W. B. Bankhead 49 So. 858, (Ala. 1909)
  • Wilkerson v. Sellers & Orum Co. 49 So. 874, (Ala. 1909)
  • Wood Mercantile Co. v. McAdoo 49 So. 856, (Ala. 1909)
  • Ellis & Co. v. Brannon 49 So. 1034, (Ala. 1909)
« Prev 1 … 6 7 8 9 10 … 15 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑