1909
740 Supreme Court of Alabama opinions from 1909.
- Johnson v. Miller 49 So. 858, (Ala. 1909)
- Clarke v. Dunn 50 So. 93, (Ala. 1909)
- Nolen v. Brophy 49 So. 1038, (Ala. 1909)
- Rapport & Bro. v. Birmingham Railway, L. & P. Co. 49 So. 674, (Ala. 1909)
- Allen v. State 50 So. 279, (Ala. 1909)
- Cefalu v. Dearborn & Warfield 49 So. 1030, (Ala. 1909)
- Prince v. Prince 49 So. 873, (Ala. 1909)
- Ham v. State ex rel. Blackmon 49 So. 1032, (Ala. 1909)
- Houston v. Davis 49 So. 869, (Ala. 1909)
- Costello v. Feagin 50 So. 134, (Ala. 1909)
- Wright v. Sample 50 So. 268, (Ala. 1909)
- Weinstein v. Yielding Bros. & Co. 50 So. 123, (Ala. 1909)
- Marx v. Kilby Locomotive & Machine Works 50 So. 136, (Ala. 1909)
- Pollack v. Gunter & Gunter 50 So. 155, (Ala. 1909)
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Art Metal Construction Co. 50 So. 186, (Ala. 1909)
- W. T. Adams Machine Co. v. Turner 50 So. 308, (Ala. 1909)
- Reese v. Ivey 50 So. 223, (Ala. 1909)
- Southern Ry. Co. v. Hartshorne 50 So. 139, (Ala. 1909)
- Houston v. Howze 50 So. 266, (Ala. 1909)
- Turner v. Louisville & Nashville R. R. 50 So. 124, (Ala. 1909)
- Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. Johnson 50 So. 300, (Ala. 1909)
- St. Louis &. S. F. R. R. v. Savage 50 So. 113, (Ala. 1909)
- Birmingham Railway L. & P. Co. v. Morris 50 So. 198, (Ala. 1909)
- Stanford v. St. Louis & San Francisco R. R. 50 So. 110, (Ala. 1909)
- Howard v. State 49 So. 755, (Ala. 1909)
- Caldwell v. State 49 So. 679, (Ala. 1909)
- McMillan v. State 49 So. 680, (Ala. 1909)
- Bailey v. State 49 So. 754, (Ala. 1909)
- Board of Revenue of Jefferson v. Birmingham Waterworks Co. 49 So. 683, (Ala. 1909)
- Ryan v. City of Birmingham 49 So. 749, (Ala. 1909)
- Sherrer v. Enterprise Banking Co. 49 So. 779, (Ala. 1909)
- Johnson v. Scoggins 49 So. 785, (Ala. 1909)
- Roach v. Cox 49 So. 578, (Ala. 1909)
- City of Graymont v. Stott 49 So. 683, (Ala. 1909)
- Bufford v. City of Birmingham 49 So. 751, (Ala. 1909)
- Davenport v. City of Birmingham 49 So. 751, (Ala. 1909)
- Fowler v. State 49 So. 788, (Ala. 1909)
- Gaston v. State 49 So. 876, (Ala. 1909)
- Mosely v. State 49 So. 807, (Ala. 1909)
- Piano v. State 49 So. 803, (Ala. 1909)
- Sheffield Co. v. Morton 49 So. 772, (Ala. 1909)
- Western Union Tel. Co. v. Emerson 49 So. 820, (Ala. 1909)
- City of Birmingham v. Chestnutt 49 So. 813, (Ala. 1909)
- Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. Mitchell 49 So. 851, (Ala. 1909)
- Southern Ry. Co. v. Abraham Bros. 49 So. 801, (Ala. 1909)
- West Pratt Coal Co. v. Dorman 49 So. 849, (Ala. 1909)
- Merriweather v. Sayre Mining & Mfg. Co. 49 So. 916, (Ala. 1909)
- Birmingham Railway L. &. P. Co. v. Camp 49 So. 846, (Ala. 1909)
- Thompson v. Aetna L. I. Co. 49 So. 802, (Ala. 1909)
- O'Byrne v. Henley 50 So. 83, (Ala. 1909)