Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /California /Cases /California Courts of Appeal /

1922

624 California Courts of Appeal opinions from 1922.

  • Garcia v. Sainz 210 P. 534, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • People v. Savinovich 210 P. 526, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • People v. Jo Fong 210 P. 548, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • In Re Stevens 210 P. 442, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Bar Assn. of San Francisco v. De Vall 210 P. 279, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Pryor v. McGuire 210 P. 532, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • McGowan v. Burg Bros. 210 P. 545, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • California Notion & Toy Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission 210 P. 524, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Francis v. Merkley 210 P. 437, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Steel v. Thompson 210 P. 430, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Tahoe Pines Co. v. Newman 210 P. 445, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Federal Construction Co. v. Ensign 210 P. 536, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Brown v. Chowchilla Land Co. 210 P. 424, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Helmuth v. Industrial Accident Commission 210 P. 428, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Peoples State Bank v. Penello 210 P. 432, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • People v. Herbert 210 P. 276, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission 210 P. 51, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Severini v. Sutter-Butte Canal Co. 210 P. 49, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • People v. Lauman 210 P. 421, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Lane v. Starkey 210 P. 277, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Levy v. Kahn 210 P. 40, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • People v. Wren 210 P. 60, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Birch v. County of Orange 210 P. 57, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Kirkpatrick v. Pye 210 P. 438, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • People v. Martinez 210 P. 61, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Siegman v. Fetters 210 P. 49, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Cockerill v. Tobin 209 P. 1022, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • People v. Sherman 209 P. 1023, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Rosenbloom v. Southern Pacific Co. 210 P. 53, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Allen v. San Francisco Wholesale Dairy Produce Exchange 210 P. 41, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Sanfilippo v. Lesser 210 P. 44, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • People v. Sander 209 P. 1027, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Pacific Acceptance Corp. v. Bank of Italy 209 P. 1024, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • People v. Mercado 209 P. 1035, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • People v. Mit Singh 209 P. 1013, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • People v. Bannon 209 P. 1029, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • People v. Piazza 209 P. 1017, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Bishop v. Superior Court 209 P. 1012, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Fidelity Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Schaefer 210 P. 47, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Althouse v. Provident Mutual Building-Loan Ass'n 209 P. 1018, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Braden v. Mitchell 210 P. 43, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Heberling v. Day 209 P. 908, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Pellissier v. Whittier Water Co. 209 P. 593, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Beyerle v. Clift 209 P. 1015, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • County of Placer v. Lake Tahoe Railway & Transportation Co. 209 P. 900, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Abbey v. Board of Directors 209 P. 709, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Miller & Lux Inc. v. San Joaquin Agricultural Co. 209 P. 592, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Lachman Co. v. Central California Berry Growers' Ass'n 209 P. 379, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Lachman Co. v. Berry Growers' Assn. 209 P. 381, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Lachman Co. v. Berry Growers' Assn. 209 P. 381, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
« Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 … 13 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑